2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776114120036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum transport equation for systems with rough surfaces and its application to ultracold neutrons in a quantizing gravity field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large amplitude of roughness in this setup could degrade the usability of the results. One of the possible ways to circumvent these difficulties and produce a much more controllable environment would be the use of a radically new design for a rough mirror which we called an Ising mirror [31,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large amplitude of roughness in this setup could degrade the usability of the results. One of the possible ways to circumvent these difficulties and produce a much more controllable environment would be the use of a radically new design for a rough mirror which we called an Ising mirror [31,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaling is obvious. The dependence on the correlation radius is more elusive and we cannot get an analytical expression similar to (33). The reason is the presence of 1/2 in the argument of (0) 2 (40) in the integrand in (36).…”
Section: Waveguides With 2d Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are several ways how to suppress fluctuations and make identification of the correlation function easier. One can average the correlation function over several samples and use the averaged values for identification as in, for example, [38,39]. This is done in the last row in Tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Identification Of the Correlation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D results (Table 4) are different because of different dimensionality and smaller linear sizes of our samples. Here as an observable, which is used to compare the results, we use Φ 2 which describes the neutron count in experiments with 2D roughness [38,41]. The generated rough surfaces are emulating the Gaussian roughness with the correlation function (|x|) = exp(−|x| 2 /8) (i.e., = 1, = 2) for which Φ 2 = 2.58 × 10 3 .…”
Section: Surfaces With Any Predetermined Roughness Correlatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%