2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Suppression of Alignment in Ultrasmall Grains: Microwave Emission From Spinning Dust Will Be Negligibly Polarized

Abstract: The quantization of energy levels in very nanoparticles suppresses dissipative processes that convert grain rotational kinetic energy into heat. For grains small enough to have ∼GHz rotation rates, the suppression of dissipation can be extreme. As a result, alignment of such grains is suppressed. This applies both to alignment of the grain body with its angular momentum J, and to alignment of J with the local magnetic field B 0 . If the anomalous microwave emission is rotational emission from spinning grains, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theory suggests that AME should only be very weakly polarized. Draine & Hensley (2016) predict a polarization fraction of 10 −6 and current measurements place upper limits of ∼ 1% on the polarization fraction of diffuse AME. See the review of theory and observations in Dickinson et al (2018).…”
Section: Amementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Theory suggests that AME should only be very weakly polarized. Draine & Hensley (2016) predict a polarization fraction of 10 −6 and current measurements place upper limits of ∼ 1% on the polarization fraction of diffuse AME. See the review of theory and observations in Dickinson et al (2018).…”
Section: Amementioning
confidence: 73%
“…AME is strongly correlated with far-infrared thermal dust emission at 100 microns (Davies et al 2006), so the best explanation for AME so far is electric dipole radiation from spinning dust grains in our Galaxy (Draine & Lazarian 1998). Since spinning dust polarization has been shown to be negligibly small (Draine & Hensley 2016), we consider unpolarized AME in our simulations.…”
Section: Amementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant contributors to the extinction are small silicates (sSi) in the far-UV, small graphite (gr) and PAH in the 217.5 nm extinction bump region, large amorphous carbon (aC) with a nearly constant extinction at 2 ≤ x = 1/λ ≤ 7 µm −1 , and large silicates (Si) that show a linear increase of the extinction with x in that range. Draine & Hensley (2016) pointed out that the rapid fall-off of the polarisation of starlight in the far-UV suggests that small (r < 6 nm) grains are nearly spherical and do not contribute to the far-UV polarisation. On the other hand, interstellar polarisation cannot be explained by spherical particles made of optically isotropic material.…”
Section: Dust Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%