2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05254-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Statistical Mechanics, L-Series and Anabelian Geometry I: Partition Functions

Abstract: Abstract. It is known that two number fields with the same Dedekind zeta function are not necessarily isomorphic. The zeta function of a number field can be interpreted as the partition function of an associated quantum statistical mechanical system, which is a C * -algebra with a one parameter group of automorphisms, built from Artin reciprocity. In the first part of this paper, we prove that isomorphism of number fields is the same as isomorphism of these associated systems. Considering the systems as noncom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic Galois theory (as in proposition 8.1 in ref. 4) then shows that it also maps the group of the maximal abelian extension of K unramified outside m to that of L ramified outside φðmÞ; i.e., the inertia group of v in K ab is mapped to that of of φðvÞ in L ab . If we combine this with the map π v ↦π φðvÞ , we find the desired map Φ v : K * v → L * φðvÞ that automatically respects the order functions.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Basic Galois theory (as in proposition 8.1 in ref. 4) then shows that it also maps the group of the maximal abelian extension of K unramified outside m to that of L ramified outside φðmÞ; i.e., the inertia group of v in K ab is mapped to that of of φðvÞ in L ab . If we combine this with the map π v ↦π φðvÞ , we find the desired map Φ v : K * v → L * φðvÞ that automatically respects the order functions.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4, section 7.3, but some differences arise from the geometric situation. The rough idea is as follows: A priori Φ is only a homeomorphism (between Cantor sets).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations