2019
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2018.2889829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum State Merging for Arbitrarily Small-Dimensional Systems

Abstract: Recent advances in quantum technology facilitate the realization of information processing using quantum computers at least on the small and intermediate scales of up to several dozens of qubits. We investigate entanglement cost required for one-shot quantum state merging, aiming at quantum state transformation on these scales. In contrast to existing coding algorithms achieving nearly optimal approximate quantum state merging on a large scale, we construct algorithms for exact quantum state merging so that th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An asymptotically non-surviving separation has been recently discovered in Ref. [74] in a communication task of quantum state merging [29,30,72]. Reference [74] discloses this phenomena by proving the difference in the required amount of entanglement resources in achieving one-shot quantum state merging under one-way and two-way LOCC, while this difference ceases to exist in the conventional asymptotic quantum state merging.…”
Section: Liccmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An asymptotically non-surviving separation has been recently discovered in Ref. [74] in a communication task of quantum state merging [29,30,72]. Reference [74] discloses this phenomena by proving the difference in the required amount of entanglement resources in achieving one-shot quantum state merging under one-way and two-way LOCC, while this difference ceases to exist in the conventional asymptotic quantum state merging.…”
Section: Liccmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this letter, we show that the minimal entanglement cost in state merging under one-way LOCC and that under two-way LOCC can be different in a one-shot scenario, whereas they coincide in the asymptotic scenario [5,6]. State merging and its generalized task, state redistribution [43,44], have also been defined and analyzed in various one-shot scenarios [4,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], as well as other derivatives [61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. In the one-shot scenarios, state merging can be achieved using techniques of one-shot decoupling [49], the convex-split lemma [55], or the Koashi-Imoto decomposition [4].…”
Section: Analogously To the Classical Slepian-wolf Problem B's Part O...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…State merging and its generalized task, state redistribution [43,44], have also been defined and analyzed in various one-shot scenarios [4,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], as well as other derivatives [61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. In the one-shot scenarios, state merging can be achieved using techniques of one-shot decoupling [49], the convex-split lemma [55], or the Koashi-Imoto decomposition [4]. However, these existing techniques employ only one-way communication similarly to the asymptotic scenario.…”
Section: Analogously To the Classical Slepian-wolf Problem B's Part O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, recent studies develop analyses without taking the asymptotic limit, which is called the one-shot scenarios [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Since one-shot analyses overcome the difficulties of the asymptotic results [40], they are of great importance not only theoretically but also experimentally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%