1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2313(90)90011-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-size stark effect in semiconductor microcrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This occurs because a carrier inside the crystalline occupy one of the confined electronic states, which increase in energy with decreasing nanocrystal size [4]. Below a critical radius, the confinement energy exceeds the Coulomb interaction between the ionized impurity and the carrier [5], which then automatically occupies a nanocrystal state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs because a carrier inside the crystalline occupy one of the confined electronic states, which increase in energy with decreasing nanocrystal size [4]. Below a critical radius, the confinement energy exceeds the Coulomb interaction between the ionized impurity and the carrier [5], which then automatically occupies a nanocrystal state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrated intensity of photoluminescence depends analogously on the external electric field strength E for both nanocrystals and nanorods. The photoluminescence band maximum for the nanocrystals is shifted in proportion to E 2 , which corresponds to the quantum-confined Stark effect in the nanocrystals [1,3,[14][15][16], and for the nanorods it is shifted linearly, in proportion to E (linear effect) and also less effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We see that decay of the photoluminescence of nanocrystals and nanorods occurs in the same time range, has pronounced non-monoexponential character, and exhibits a weak dependence on the magnitude of the external field. In order to establish the quantitative difference in the photoluminescence decay kinetics for nanocrystals and nanorods, it is sufficient to analyze the nanosecond range of decay times, in which (as shown earlier in [16]), there are characteristic differences. For a more exact estimate of the change in the photoluminescence decay rate for the nanoparticles, we used an approximation of the kinetics by a multiexponential function Table 1 gives the average photoluminescence decay time, determined from the formula…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spatial confinement of the carriers motion in the semiconductor nanocrystals results in dramatic transformation of their zone structure, as well as the dynamicS of excited states. There is a number of papers on the influence of external electric field on the linear and nonlinear absorption spectra of the direct-gap semiconductor nanocrystals in various matrices [4][5][6]. The development of quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) was observed in many experiments [1,[4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a number of papers on the influence of external electric field on the linear and nonlinear absorption spectra of the direct-gap semiconductor nanocrystals in various matrices [4][5][6]. The development of quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) was observed in many experiments [1,[4][5][6]. The investigation of high electric field influence on the absorption spectra of the quantum-sized (QS) nanocrystals gives the information about the field-induced perturbations in the energetic levels of nanocrystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%