2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.11017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum size effect in self-organized InAs/GaAs quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
95
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
12
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…69,75,76 At the same time, the large energy spacing between the ground and the excited orbital ͑10 −2 -10 −1 eV͒ of the quantum dots ensures that the electron qubit stays in the ground orbital while the two-qubit operation is conducted. 70 This result shows that the electronnuclear spin interaction does not hinder quantum-dot based quantum computer architectures from being scalable even in the presence of inhomogeneous environments causing inhomogeneous hyperfine splittings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…69,75,76 At the same time, the large energy spacing between the ground and the excited orbital ͑10 −2 -10 −1 eV͒ of the quantum dots ensures that the electron qubit stays in the ground orbital while the two-qubit operation is conducted. 70 This result shows that the electronnuclear spin interaction does not hinder quantum-dot based quantum computer architectures from being scalable even in the presence of inhomogeneous environments causing inhomogeneous hyperfine splittings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The electron energy spacing ⌬E e of a self-assembled dot is about 10 −2 -10 −1 eV, depending on the geometry and size of the dot. 70 Therefore, the value of J that satisfies the dual condition lies between 10 −4 and 10 −3 eV, which is achievable with vertically stacked self-assembled dots. In conclusion, with J between 10 −4 and 10 −3 eV, the error due to hyperfine-coupling induced inhomogeneities in Zeeman energies is smaller than the threshold for error correction, and the qubit leakage to higher orbitals can be effectively prevented.…”
Section: Effect Of Electron-nuclear Spin Interaction On Qubit Opementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that electrons are confined in a parabolic-like potential within the lens-shaped QDs. 31,32 It can be noted in Fig. 7 that the experimentally observed temperature dependence of the optical transition energies (symbols) fit fairly well with the semi-empirical Varshni expression 33 …”
Section: Temperature-dependent Photoreflectance Spectrasupporting
confidence: 48%
“…15 The continuous shift was caused by the presence of extended states in high-density QD clusters without, however, any FIG. 1.…”
Section: Macro-pl: Excitation Power Density Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%