2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep16581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Process Tomography of an Optically-Controlled Kerr Non-linearity

Abstract: Any optical quantum information processing machine would be comprised of fully-characterized constituent devices for both single state manipulations and tasks involving the interaction between multiple quantum optical states. Ideally for the latter, would be an apparatus capable of deterministic optical phase shifts that operate on input quantum states with the action mediated solely by auxiliary signal fields. Here we present the complete experimental characterization of a system designed for optically contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polarization of each of the retrieved qubit states is obtained with the following procedure [24]: (a) measurement of the polarization of all the input states, (b) qubit storage experiment and determination of the output Stokes vectors (S out ), (c) rotation of input states to match the orthogonal axis of the normalized stored vectors (S in ) and (d) evaluation of the total fidelity using F = 1 2 (1 + S out · S in + (1 − S out · S out )(1 − S in · S in )). We obtained an average fidelity of 86.6±0.6%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The polarization of each of the retrieved qubit states is obtained with the following procedure [24]: (a) measurement of the polarization of all the input states, (b) qubit storage experiment and determination of the output Stokes vectors (S out ), (c) rotation of input states to match the orthogonal axis of the normalized stored vectors (S in ) and (d) evaluation of the total fidelity using F = 1 2 (1 + S out · S in + (1 − S out · S out )(1 − S in · S in )). We obtained an average fidelity of 86.6±0.6%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal qubit storage fidelities are obtained for non-maximal storage efficiency. A combination of these three techniques have been used in our previous investigation to obtain fidelities >75% with storage efficiencies ∼ 5% [24]. d) Probe temporal duration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such information can be extracted from the tensor elements mapping the input state density matrix to certain off-diagonal element of the output state. For example, the phase value the 𝜌 01 𝑜𝑢𝑡 element of the output state is determined by the phases Im{ln[𝜀 01 𝑚𝑛 ]} of 𝜀 01 𝑚𝑛 process tensor elements [45]. To elaborate this relation, we decompose the process 𝜀 into a phase shift superoperator and a phase-symmetric process 𝜀 ′ 𝜌 ̂𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 𝜀(𝜌 ̂𝑖𝑛 ) = 𝑈 ̂(𝜙)𝜀 ′ (𝜌 ̂𝑖𝑛 )𝑈 ̂ †(𝜙) = 𝑒 𝑖𝜙𝑎 ̂ †𝑎 ̂𝜀′ (𝜌 ̂𝑖𝑛 )𝑒 −𝑖𝜙𝑎 ̂ †𝑎 ̂, (8) where 𝜙 is a constant phase shift.…”
Section: Quantum Process Tomography Of Metal-hole Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further advancing quantum technologies requires improvements in the fidelities of basic operations. Consequently, more precise and efficient reconstruction and diagnostic tools for estimation of quantum states [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], processes [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and measurements [21][22][23][24] are essential. Quantum tomographic techniques for optical quantum states of light have become standard tools because quantum light sources are essential for implementations of continuous-variable (CV) quantum computation and communication [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%