2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-02606-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Phenomena in Clusters and Nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3. What is the explanation for a maximum of the size dependent activity (typically in the 1-2 nm size regime), which is controversially discussed in literature [1,[4][5][6]? These questions directly relate to the atomic structure of small nano-objects in the 1-2 nm size regime, which is a challenge for different experimental techniques: In conventional powder x-ray diffraction the finite particle size gives rise to broad overlapping reflections 40 and in transmission electron microscopy small nanoparticles are often found to be unstable in the electron beam [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. What is the explanation for a maximum of the size dependent activity (typically in the 1-2 nm size regime), which is controversially discussed in literature [1,[4][5][6]? These questions directly relate to the atomic structure of small nano-objects in the 1-2 nm size regime, which is a challenge for different experimental techniques: In conventional powder x-ray diffraction the finite particle size gives rise to broad overlapping reflections 40 and in transmission electron microscopy small nanoparticles are often found to be unstable in the electron beam [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular this behavior has been tested in models where the interaction is restricted to first neighbors [9,10,14], e.g., quantum Ising and X-Y models in an external field, in order to precisely estimate the parameters of the system and to provide useful information about the phase diagram. In view of the attention paid to systems with more sophisticated interaction among lattice sites [15][16][17][18] a question thus naturally arises as to whether criticality may be exploited to enhance metrology in systems with interaction beyond the first-neighbor approximation. * matteo.paris@fisica.unimi.it In this framework, systems described by the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model provide nontrivial examples to assess quantum criticality as a resource for quantum estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M ass spectrometry has been crucial to the field of cluster research since its inception (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). A variety of cluster formation methods, primarily including laser vaporization (LaVa) (10)(11)(12), pulsed-arc discharge (PACIS) (13)(14)(15), electrospray ionization (ESI) (16), gas aggregation (17)(18), and inert gas sputtering (CORDIS) (18) have enabled the creation of both positively and negatively charged as well as neutral gas-phase clusters across a large size range and with diverse elemental composition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%