2020
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-00469-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum phase transitions and the role of impurity-substrate hybridization in Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states

Abstract: Spin-dependent scattering from magnetic impurities inside a superconductor gives rise to Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) states within the superconducting gap. They can be modeled by the largely equivalent Kondo or Anderson impurity models. The role of the magnetic and nonmagnetic properties of the impurity in relation to the coupling to the substrate is still under debate. Here, we use a scanning tunneling microscope to make a quantitative connection between the energy of a YSR state and the impurity-substrate hybridi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(72 reference statements)
5
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, when the energy crosses the Fermi level at the critical coupling J C , a first-order quantum phase transition between the singlet (screened) and the doublet (unscreened) ground state is expected 49 , 51 . Very recently, a similar force-based scenario has been reported in different systems involving magnetic ad-atoms on top of superconductors 15 , including Fe(Te,Se) 30 . As discussed in Supplementary Note 2 , a similar scenario can in principle explain the sub-gap dispersion discovered here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, when the energy crosses the Fermi level at the critical coupling J C , a first-order quantum phase transition between the singlet (screened) and the doublet (unscreened) ground state is expected 49 , 51 . Very recently, a similar force-based scenario has been reported in different systems involving magnetic ad-atoms on top of superconductors 15 , including Fe(Te,Se) 30 . As discussed in Supplementary Note 2 , a similar scenario can in principle explain the sub-gap dispersion discovered here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In-gap states have a long history of shining light into the properties of different host materials, and have allowed to bring insight into gap symmetry and structure, symmetry breaking, or the absence of scattering in topological defects, to name a few [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] . Impurity bound states have also been investigated in chains or arrays of magnetic impurities on superconducting surfaces where they can lead to Majorana edge-states [25][26][27][28] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the critical exchange coupling, the YSR state appears at E F , i.e., ZBP, with equal contributions from electron and hole parts. The QPT was observed for magnetic impurities or molecules [19,43,[45][46][47]. Our scenario qualitatively differs from them since the ZBP in our case is induced by the rotation of the impurity moment.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…We find discrete energy levels E n and the shape of electron and hole wave functions , of CdGM vortex bound states (with n the angular momentum number). Magnetic YSR impurities are characterized as usual by the exchange coupling J at the impurity sites 30 . This coupling leads to an effective Hamiltonian in the subspace spanned by the states ψ n −1 , ψ n , ψ n +1 , with solution , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%