2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.126.136602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Phase Transition at Nonzero Doping in a Random tJ Model

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18,19] using bosonic spinons, in which case the spin glass order can be large, with q EA = O(M 0 ) (see (A2)). However, numerical studies of the SU(2) case show that the spin glass order is small [12,13],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[18,19] using bosonic spinons, in which case the spin glass order can be large, with q EA = O(M 0 ) (see (A2)). However, numerical studies of the SU(2) case show that the spin glass order is small [12,13],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the numerical estimate q EA ∼ 0.02 [13], the spin liquid behavior of (1.3) is visible over a wide range of frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, at finite temperatures, the above method should be hard to treat both excitations with distinct energy scales. Thus, we use the TPQ state method [30,31], where local quantities are efficiently evaluated without the trace calculations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. An important point is that this numerical method takes several energy scales into account on equal footing, and thereby has been successfully used in several systems such as the Heisenberg model on frustrated lattices [30][31][32][43][44][45][46] and the Kitaev models [47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%