“…MCTDH used as a reference in Section 3, or ab initio multiple spawning used as a reference in ref. 46, EF-based MQC methods offer a generally significantly lower computational cost, 76 while generally being less accurate. An advantage compared to MCTDH however, aside from scaling linearly instead of exponentially with the number of degrees of freedom, is that, like other trajectory-based methods, EF-based MQC methods can be run with arbitrary potentials, including analytical, semi-empirical, ab initio potential energy surfaces computed on-the-fly or even hybrid QM/MM potentials, while MCTDH is only well-suited for systems where the wavefunction is expressed as a sum of products of single-particle wavefunctions, so the potentials should be compatible with this formalism.…”