2023
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-2kgfl
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum molecular dynamics simulations of the effect of secondary modes on the photoisomerization of a retinal chromophore model

Abstract: In this paper, we report on the performance of various quantum molecu- lar dynamics simulation methods in describing the photo-induced nonadi- abatic dynamics underlying the isomerization process of the retinal chromophore in rhodopsin. We focus on purely quantum vibronic wavepacket techniques and on various trajectory-based schemes, discussing their capability of accurately capture the isomerization process using a two-dimensional two-state model system coupled to an environment of secondary harmonic modes. N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCTDH used as a reference in Section 3, or ab initio multiple spawning used as a reference in ref. 46, EF-based MQC methods offer a generally significantly lower computational cost, 76 while generally being less accurate. An advantage compared to MCTDH however, aside from scaling linearly instead of exponentially with the number of degrees of freedom, is that, like other trajectory-based methods, EF-based MQC methods can be run with arbitrary potentials, including analytical, semi-empirical, ab initio potential energy surfaces computed on-the-fly or even hybrid QM/MM potentials, while MCTDH is only well-suited for systems where the wavefunction is expressed as a sum of products of single-particle wavefunctions, so the potentials should be compatible with this formalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCTDH used as a reference in Section 3, or ab initio multiple spawning used as a reference in ref. 46, EF-based MQC methods offer a generally significantly lower computational cost, 76 while generally being less accurate. An advantage compared to MCTDH however, aside from scaling linearly instead of exponentially with the number of degrees of freedom, is that, like other trajectory-based methods, EF-based MQC methods can be run with arbitrary potentials, including analytical, semi-empirical, ab initio potential energy surfaces computed on-the-fly or even hybrid QM/MM potentials, while MCTDH is only well-suited for systems where the wavefunction is expressed as a sum of products of single-particle wavefunctions, so the potentials should be compatible with this formalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%