1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.59.024012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum modular group in (2+1)-dimensional gravity

Abstract: The role of the modular group in the holonomy representation of (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity is studied. This representation can be viewed as a "Heisenberg picture," and for simple topologies, the transformation to the ADM "Schrödinger picture" may be found. For spacetimes with the spatial topology of a torus, this transformation and an explicit operator representation of the mapping class group are constructed. It is shown that the quantum modular group splits the holonomy representation Hilbert space in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the corresponding Schröodinger picture, we proceed as in ordinary quantum mechanics: We diagonalize , obtaining a transition matrix that allows us to transform between representations [68, 88]. The resulting “time”-dependent wave functions obey a Schrödinger equation of the form (52, 53), but with the Laplacian in Ĥ replaced by the weight 1/2 Maass Laplacian Δ 1/2 of Equation (54).…”
Section: Quantum Gravity In 2 + 1 Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain the corresponding Schröodinger picture, we proceed as in ordinary quantum mechanics: We diagonalize , obtaining a transition matrix that allows us to transform between representations [68, 88]. The resulting “time”-dependent wave functions obey a Schrödinger equation of the form (52, 53), but with the Laplacian in Ĥ replaced by the weight 1/2 Maass Laplacian Δ 1/2 of Equation (54).…”
Section: Quantum Gravity In 2 + 1 Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a useful byproduct, this analysis allows us to solve the problem of the poorly-behaved action of the modular group discussed at the end of Section 3.2 [88, 89]. If we start with a reduced phase space wave function and use the transition matrix K to determine a Chern-Simons wave function , we find, indeed, that is not modular invariant.…”
Section: Quantum Gravity In 2 + 1 Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would also be interesting to establish a relation with previous work on the (Lorentzian) torus universe [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. This would require relating our holonomy-based formalism to time-dependent formalisms along the lines of [19,20,22].…”
Section: Outlook and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It would be interesting to understand how our result is related to the descriptions in [16,17,18,21,22] and to identify a common source of this problem. This would require relating the timeless formulation in terms of holonomies to time dependent quantisation formalisms.…”
Section: Mapping Class Actions In the Quantised Torus Universementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of a Gaussian we can use the modularinvariant wavefunctions of Carlip and Nelson [13,30,31] (λ, µ) = andψ ν (τ,τ ) are the automorphic modular forms of weight −1/2 on the torus, with eigenvalues λ ν with respect to −1/2 , the Maass Laplacian of weight −1/2 (see [13] for definitions):…”
Section: Modular Invariant Wavefunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%