2001
DOI: 10.1021/jp004413y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Mechanical Study of the Nonbonded Forces in Water−Methanol Complexes

Abstract: The water-methanol dimer can adopt two possible configurations (WdM or MdW) depending on whether the water or the methanol acts as the hydrogen bond donor. The relative stability between the two configurations is less than 1 kcal/mol, and as a result, this dimer has been a challenging system to investigate using either theoretical or experimental techniques. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the dependence of the geometries, interaction energies, and harmonic frequencies on basis sets and treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
74
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…O distances for the complexes where the methanol molecule is the proton acceptor and proton donor are calculated as 2.860 Å and 2.913 Å, respectively. An early theoretical study by Kirschner and Woods [43] found the results of 2.845 Å and 2.912 Å, respectively, in good agreement with our results. The experimental result for the proton acceptor case has been inferred as 2.997 Ϯ 0.009 Å [15], but this experimental value could not be reproduced theoretically, even at a very high level of calculation [43].…”
Section: Calculation Detailssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…O distances for the complexes where the methanol molecule is the proton acceptor and proton donor are calculated as 2.860 Å and 2.913 Å, respectively. An early theoretical study by Kirschner and Woods [43] found the results of 2.845 Å and 2.912 Å, respectively, in good agreement with our results. The experimental result for the proton acceptor case has been inferred as 2.997 Ϯ 0.009 Å [15], but this experimental value could not be reproduced theoretically, even at a very high level of calculation [43].…”
Section: Calculation Detailssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It should be noted that in the same study the methanol-water complex with the methanol as hydrogen bond donor is found to be the most stable, in contradiction with the MP2 basis-set limit result of Ref. [74]. This suggests that in the Ref.…”
Section: Gas-phase Complexesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Switching to the other ethanol conformer within either complex destabilizes the complex by 0.07 and 0.4 kcal/mol, respectively. The relative stability of the ethanol donor and acceptor complexes is similar to that for the methanol-water complex where CPMD-BLYP [53] and the complete-basis-set MP2 estimate [74] yields the methanol acceptor complex stable by 0.74 and 0.35 kcal/mol, respectively. There are no experimental data for the structure and energetics of the ethanol-water dimer.…”
Section: Gas-phase Complexesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To remain consistent with the GLYCAM06 formalism, the following criteria were used to guide its extension: 1) the new parameters should be transferable to the most common and biologically relevant lipids, lipid bilayers, and glycolipids, 2) they should be self-contained and therefore readily transferable to many quadratic force fields, 3) as few new atom types as possible should be introduced, 4) the new parameters should be compatible with all existing parameters and molecular classes in GLYCAM06, 5) the accuracy of the parameters should be rigorously assessed by application to developmental and test molecules through comparison with theoretical and experimental data, and 6) the use of 1-4 non-bonded electrostatic or van der Waals (vdW) scale factors should be avoided [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%