2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4919406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum mechanical differential and integral cross sections for the C(1D) + H2(ν = 0, j = 0) → CH(ν′, j′) + H reaction

Abstract: Accurate quantum dynamics calculations for the C((1)D) + H2 reaction are performed using a real wave packet approach with full Coriolis coupling. The newly constructed ZMB-a ab initio potential energy surface [Zhang et al., J. Chem. Phys. 140, 234301 (2014)] is used. The integral cross sections (ICSs), differential cross sections (DCSs), and product state distributions are obtained over a wide range of collision energies. In contrast to previous accurate quantum dynamics calculations on the reproducing kernel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the calculated results on our and PESs at higher collision energies are consistent with the observations of the crossed-beam experiments2425, in which the product angular distributions are found to be forward–backward symmetric. It should be noted that the calculated DCSs on the PES, either RKHS or ZMB-a, are nearly forward–backward symmetric252736; however previous calculations show that the addition of the contribution of the BJHL PES37 leads to a forward bias in DCS3842, in contradiction to experiment, indicating that the present PES constructed by us is more accurate than the BJHL PES.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the calculated results on our and PESs at higher collision energies are consistent with the observations of the crossed-beam experiments2425, in which the product angular distributions are found to be forward–backward symmetric. It should be noted that the calculated DCSs on the PES, either RKHS or ZMB-a, are nearly forward–backward symmetric252736; however previous calculations show that the addition of the contribution of the BJHL PES37 leads to a forward bias in DCS3842, in contradiction to experiment, indicating that the present PES constructed by us is more accurate than the BJHL PES.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Although there are other PESs and subsequent dynamical calculations2829, the RKHS PES is the most widely used in dynamical studies273031323334. Most recently, a highly accurate global ab initio PES (or Zhang-Ma-Bian-a (ZMB-a)) has been constructed by our group35, which is unique in the accurate description of the regions of vdW interactions and around conical intersections (CIs), and further dynamical calculations36 performed on this PES for the C( 1 D )+H 2 reaction confirm its accuracy. On the other hand, the excited-state PES may play an important role, and the only reported global PES is the Bussery-Honvault-Julien-Honvault-Launay (BJHL) surface constructed by Bussery-Honvault et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,51 However, these surfaces are less well validated -different topologies were obtained which resulted in a noticeable spread of rate values. 37,57 Perhaps more importantly, a slight negative temperature dependence was observed, as opposed to the presently employed surface, which suggests that the agreement with the present experimental results would be worse. Finally, the most obvious explanation is the adiabatic limit used in the present simulations.…”
contrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Besides, the calculated vibrational energy levels are also in better agreement with experiment than those computed on the BHL potential. QCT and QM studies for the reaction of C + H 2 (D 2 ) have been performed on this potential and obtained interesting results. Thus, to obtain more insight into the title reaction, it is desirable to investigate the quantum dynamics on this new constructed PES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%