2012
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/083001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum key distribution using quantum dot single-photon emitting diodes in the red and near infrared spectral range

Abstract: Abstract. We report on in-lab free space quantum key distribution (QKD) experiments over 40 cm distance using highly efficient electrically driven quantum dot single-photon sources emitting in the red as well as near-infrared spectral range. In the case of infrared emitting devices, we achieve sifted key rates of 27.2 kbit s −1 (35.4 kbit s −1 ) at a quantum bit error rate (QBER) of 3.9% (3.8%) and a g (2) (0) value of 0.35 (0.49) at moderate (high) excitation. (2) (0) value of 0.49. This first successful pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very important in view of applications, especially in optoelectronics or nanophotonics, because of the demand for some devices to be entirely polarization insensitive (e.g., optical amplifiers) and others having preferable polarization direction (e.g., lasers or single photon sources for applications in the field of quantum cryptography). There are solutions based on additional external controlling systems changing the polarization state or filtering out the unwanted components [48], but they are always accompanied by increased losses (which require being balanced by increased source efficiency-commonly already pushed to the limits), more complicated fabrication processes, or significantly less compact device designs. It would be preferable if the polarization of light suitable for specific applications could be selected based on the design of the active region alone.…”
Section: A Degree Of Linear Polarization Of the Surface Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is very important in view of applications, especially in optoelectronics or nanophotonics, because of the demand for some devices to be entirely polarization insensitive (e.g., optical amplifiers) and others having preferable polarization direction (e.g., lasers or single photon sources for applications in the field of quantum cryptography). There are solutions based on additional external controlling systems changing the polarization state or filtering out the unwanted components [48], but they are always accompanied by increased losses (which require being balanced by increased source efficiency-commonly already pushed to the limits), more complicated fabrication processes, or significantly less compact device designs. It would be preferable if the polarization of light suitable for specific applications could be selected based on the design of the active region alone.…”
Section: A Degree Of Linear Polarization Of the Surface Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the quantum emitter can be implemented into scalable cavity structures like QDs in micropillar cavities [16][17][18] or photonic waveguides [19][20][21]. Second, successful proof-of-principle quantum key distribution experiments using QD-based sources have already been demonstrated [22][23][24]. While the epitaxial growth of low density InGaAs or InP QDs is well established nowadays, it still relies on extremely close control of growth parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, QKD is implemented using weak coherent pulses (WCPs), as the preparation of true single photon pulses requires a comparably huge technological overhead [97][98][99]. Yet, a WCP fundamentally contradicts the idea of a qubit, which is by definition a single quantum entity.…”
Section: Weak Coherent Pulses and Decoy Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%