2002
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/23/6/303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum interference with slits

Abstract: In the experiments considered here, we measure the y-component of momentum for a particle passing through a system of slits. The source-slit system is the preparation apparatus that determines the state vector. Recognizing that a system of slits is a positionmeasuring device allows us to ascertain that the state vector is a position state. Then, writing the state vector in momentum space provides a straightforward calculation for the probability amplitude and its corresponding probability function. Interferenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of ρ(x, t) in Figs. 5 and 7 shows that the graphs are very similar, but there are The probability density ρ(x, t) for two symmetric slits with initial data a symmetric two-step step function (inset) with step centers at ±s = ±1.0, step widths 0.4 (a = 0.1), step height 1.0/ √ 8a = 1.0/ √ .8 as in (11), and corresponding envelope ρ + (x, t) + ρ − (x, t) formed from one-step step functions with initial data ψ 0+ (x), ψ 0− (x), centers at ±s = ±1.0, widths 0.4, and height 1.0/ √ 4a = 1.0/ √ .4. Secondary small amplitude waves are visible.…”
Section: The Wave Interpretation Of Schrödinger's Equation For the Twmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of ρ(x, t) in Figs. 5 and 7 shows that the graphs are very similar, but there are The probability density ρ(x, t) for two symmetric slits with initial data a symmetric two-step step function (inset) with step centers at ±s = ±1.0, step widths 0.4 (a = 0.1), step height 1.0/ √ 8a = 1.0/ √ .8 as in (11), and corresponding envelope ρ + (x, t) + ρ − (x, t) formed from one-step step functions with initial data ψ 0+ (x), ψ 0− (x), centers at ±s = ±1.0, widths 0.4, and height 1.0/ √ 4a = 1.0/ √ .4. Secondary small amplitude waves are visible.…”
Section: The Wave Interpretation Of Schrödinger's Equation For the Twmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the special case that the two slits are symmetric (that is, a 1 = a 2 = a), formula (6) simplifies (the case k = 0 is given in [10,11]):…”
Section: The Wave Interpretation Of Schrödinger's Equation For the Twmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these works, the earliest one due to Marcella [3] proposes an expression to calculate the intensity of the diffracted beam using a reduced state ket of the particle. The collapse of state due to the process of measurement leads to this wave function, which is equivalently the projection of an initial state ket into the final one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we intend to study this issue and to suggest an alternative approach to that in [3]. In the first part, the general case of performing a measurement of position on a particle in one dimension is taken up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%