Quantum Intentionality

Abstract

Freeman's naturalization of intentionality, based in classical neurophysics, and Vitiello's quantum thermofield theoretical formulation of intentionality are presented. Their collaborative work is also discussed. A revised neuroquantological account of intentionality is formulated within the thermofield framework. This account is applied to semiotics.

New Issue to Modeling Intentionality in the Field of Consciousness

“…Furthermore, in contrast to dual modes that must always locally make a match in the theory of Vitiello, the dual modes in the theory of Globus need not match locally, although they must match globally in conformity with the fundamental law of energy conservation [6] [51] [53]. In this alternative representation, the non-tilde-mode is not necessarily the mirror-image of the tilde-mode in the between-two of dual modes.…”

“…In other terms, when the intentional (self-tuning) and/or sensory signals are repeated, this repetition energizes the non-tilde trace out of the vacuum, from which it follows that quanta are created in the tilde-mode. However, when the repetition of intentional and/or sensory signals is again repeated, then there is possibly a match between-two, the belonging-together of intentional/ sensorial signals and of their recognition traces: this match occurs between the intentional/sensorial signals of the non-tilde-mode future approaching towards the Present, the Now, and the recognition traces of the tildemode past approaching towards the Now [6] [90]. Such a dual mode match is not consciousness, as in Vitiello, but existence: "intentional fulfillment, world dis-closure with us always already amidst its affordances" ( [6], p. 234).…”

“…However, when the repetition of intentional and/or sensory signals is again repeated, then there is possibly a match between-two, the belonging-together of intentional/ sensorial signals and of their recognition traces: this match occurs between the intentional/sensorial signals of the non-tilde-mode future approaching towards the Present, the Now, and the recognition traces of the tildemode past approaching towards the Now [6] [90]. Such a dual mode match is not consciousness, as in Vitiello, but existence: "intentional fulfillment, world dis-closure with us always already amidst its affordances" ( [6], p. 234). It corresponds to an achievement of the thermofield dynamics under an energy minimization principle, that is an achievement in the intentional dis-closure of Being.…”

“…Now, there is a critical region of the argument c-plane. Riemann showed that the nontrivial values of the function Zeta have all a real part 1/2, while the imaginary component varies [6]. Geometrically, there is a vertical line in the c-plane at real part 1/2, the critical line along which these nontrivial values lie.…”

“…Today, a new issue is emerging to explain intentionality. It is based on three main approaches: the "intentional arc" and the "maximum grip" proposed in the philosophy of Maurice Merleau-Ponty [2]; the reflex stimulus-response arc developed in the neurophysiological and quantum theory of Walter Freeman [3]; and the quantum systems of dual modes conceived by Giuseppe Vitiello [4] [5] and Gordon Globus [6] on the basis of thermofield (dissipation) quantum principles. My purpose is to provide a review of these contemporary dynamic models.…”