2017
DOI: 10.3233/ica-170545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum inspired evolutionary algorithms with improved rotation gates for real-coded synthetic and real world optimization problems

Abstract: We investigate two modified Quantum Evolutionary methods for solving real value problems. The Quantum Inspired Evolutionary Algorithms (QIEA) were originally used for solving binary encoded problems and their signature features follow superposition of multiple states on a quantum bit and a rotation gate. In order to apply this paradigm to real value problems, we propose two quantum methods Half Significant Bit (HSB) and Stepwise Real QEA (SRQEA), developed using binary and real encoding respectively, while kee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of the GAs has provided another approach for adjusting the parameters in the design of controllers (Kyriklidis & Dounias, ). The GA is often preferred over gradient‐based optimization methods because it uses the crossover and mutation operations to search in multiple directions thus avoiding entrapment in a local optimum (Rostami & Neri, ; Wright & Jordanov, ). More recently, many articles have been published on multiobjective GA (Carrillo, Jiang, Rojas, & Valenzuela, ; Martinez‐alvarez et al, ; Rostami, Neri, & Epitropakis, ; Wang, Liu, Yuan, & Chen, ; Yang, Emmerich, Baeck, & Kok, ) and many‐objective GA (Pan, He, Tian, Su, & Zhang, ).…”
Section: Intelligent Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the GAs has provided another approach for adjusting the parameters in the design of controllers (Kyriklidis & Dounias, ). The GA is often preferred over gradient‐based optimization methods because it uses the crossover and mutation operations to search in multiple directions thus avoiding entrapment in a local optimum (Rostami & Neri, ; Wright & Jordanov, ). More recently, many articles have been published on multiobjective GA (Carrillo, Jiang, Rojas, & Valenzuela, ; Martinez‐alvarez et al, ; Rostami, Neri, & Epitropakis, ; Wang, Liu, Yuan, & Chen, ; Yang, Emmerich, Baeck, & Kok, ) and many‐objective GA (Pan, He, Tian, Su, & Zhang, ).…”
Section: Intelligent Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional research is needed on the application of optimization techniques for the most efficient design of diagrid systems. Authors advocate the use of nature‐inspired computing techniques such as evolutionary computing or neural dynamics model of Adeli and Park that have been used effectively for both minimum weight and cost optimization of high‐rise and super‐high‐rise building structures with thousands of members …”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. Li, Jiao, Zhao, Shang, and Gong () proposed a quantum‐behaved (Wright & Jordanov, ), discrete multi‐objective particle swarm optimization for complex network clustering with the ability to determine automatically the number of clusters. The two objective functions used were the kernel k means, which is the sum density of links of intraclusters, and the ratio cut, which is defined as the sum densities of links of interclusters.…”
Section: Meta‐heuristic Multi‐ and Many‐objective Algorithms Applied mentioning
confidence: 99%