2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.90.042316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum gates with phase stability over space and time

Abstract: The performance of a quantum information processor depends on the precise control of phases introduced into the system during quantum gate operations. As the number of operations increases with the complexity of a computation, the phases of gates at different locations and different times must be controlled, which can be challenging for optically-driven operations. We circumvent this issue by demonstrating an entangling gate between two trapped atomic ions that is insensitive to the optical phases of the drivi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assign this to mechanical fluctuations (e.g., fans) that shift the standing wave of the optical Raman beams relative to the ions. This effect can be mitigated by switching to a "phase-insensitive" configuration 57 To investigate the degree to which control errors impact our physical T * 2 qubit decoherence, we perform microwave Ramsey experiments, which are not sensitive to optical beam path fluctuations. Additionally, we suppress magnetic field inhomogeneity using a dynamical decoupling technique that applies π-pulses with alternating 90°phase offsets, commonly known as an (XY ) N pulse sequence 58 , to periodically refocus the qubit spin.…”
Section: Logical T *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assign this to mechanical fluctuations (e.g., fans) that shift the standing wave of the optical Raman beams relative to the ions. This effect can be mitigated by switching to a "phase-insensitive" configuration 57 To investigate the degree to which control errors impact our physical T * 2 qubit decoherence, we perform microwave Ramsey experiments, which are not sensitive to optical beam path fluctuations. Additionally, we suppress magnetic field inhomogeneity using a dynamical decoupling technique that applies π-pulses with alternating 90°phase offsets, commonly known as an (XY ) N pulse sequence 58 , to periodically refocus the qubit spin.…”
Section: Logical T *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the sidebands could be defined around f lower , in which case f upper (as well as the feed forward correction) would be applied to the global beam channel. However, other, more complicated configurations of the MS gate exist [59] that impose different requirements on the lock parameters. These can be handled by frequency locking the two Raman transitions to different harmonics of the frequency comb, which is possible using this hardware.…”
Section: ) Each Raman Transition Consists Of Two Tones Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-qubit gate induced by Raman lasers can be realized in a way that is sensitive to the optical phase of the Raman beams and a way insensitive to the optical phase of the Raman beams [24]. The phase sensitive configuration is realized if the ∆k 1 and ∆k 2 of the bichromatic field inducing the Mølmer and Sørensen gate are parallel.…”
Section: Two-qubit Gate Realization Mølmer-sørensen Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%