2023
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi0487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-enhanced greedy combinatorial optimization solver

Maxime Dupont,
Bram Evert,
Mark J. Hodson
et al.

Abstract: Combinatorial optimization is a broadly attractive area for potential quantum advantage, but no quantum algorithm has yet made the leap. Noise in quantum hardware remains a challenge, and more sophisticated quantum-classical algorithms are required to bolster their performance. Here, we introduce an iterative quantum heuristic optimization algorithm to solve combinatorial optimization problems. The quantum algorithm reduces to a classical greedy algorithm in the presence of strong noise. We implement the quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several pre-prints on iterative/recursive quantum optimization algorithms generalizing RQAOA have appeared since the submission of this work on arXiv. Parallel works such as [ 28 – 30 ] widen the selection and variable elimination schemes within the framework of recursive quantum optimization in application to constrained problems such as Maximum Independent Set (MIS) and Max-2-SAT. Moreover, [ 28 ] show theoretical justifications of why depth-1 QAOA might not be a suitable candidate for quantum advantage and consequently urge the community to explore higher depth alternatives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several pre-prints on iterative/recursive quantum optimization algorithms generalizing RQAOA have appeared since the submission of this work on arXiv. Parallel works such as [ 28 – 30 ] widen the selection and variable elimination schemes within the framework of recursive quantum optimization in application to constrained problems such as Maximum Independent Set (MIS) and Max-2-SAT. Moreover, [ 28 ] show theoretical justifications of why depth-1 QAOA might not be a suitable candidate for quantum advantage and consequently urge the community to explore higher depth alternatives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spins). Demonstrations of QAOA range from 40-qubits on 3-regular graphs [76], over 72 qubits in a Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model [77], to up to 434 qubits on hardware-native graphs [78,79] on superconducting devices.…”
Section: Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivatives of f can then be computed by means of the chain rule and correctly chaining the Jacobians of the nodes in the graph. By traversing the computational graph and employing the chain rule on each node, the derivative νk of each node is computed as νk = j ∈pred(k) ∂ν k ∂ν j νj , (C. 77) where ∂ν k /∂ν j denotes the Jacobian of node ν k with respect to the input node ν j . If node ν k has n k inputs and m k outputs, the Jacobian is a map from R n k → R m k , which depends on the values of the input nodes.…”
Section: Approximation Of the Fubini-study Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%