2014
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/6/065003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum effective force and Bohmian approach to time-dependent traps

Abstract: Trajectories of a Bohmian particle confined in time-dependent cylindrical and spherical traps are computed for both contracting and expanding boxes. Quantum effective force is considered in arbitrary directions. It is seen that in contrast to the problem of a particle in an infinite rectangular box with one wall in motion, if particle initially is in an energy eigenstate of a tiny box the force is zero in all directions. Trajectories of a two-body system confined in the spherical trap are also computed for dif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we distinguish between a strong form and and a weak form of nonlocality. We first show that there is no strong nonlocality, in the sense that moving walls have no effect on the dynamics of a localized quantum state placed far from the wall as claimed (but never proved) in previous works [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. We then show that for quantum states extended over the well extension, the system displays a weak form of nonlocality: moving walls generate instantaneously a current density in the central region of the box.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper we distinguish between a strong form and and a weak form of nonlocality. We first show that there is no strong nonlocality, in the sense that moving walls have no effect on the dynamics of a localized quantum state placed far from the wall as claimed (but never proved) in previous works [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. We then show that for quantum states extended over the well extension, the system displays a weak form of nonlocality: moving walls generate instantaneously a current density in the central region of the box.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The particle in a box with moving walls has also been the prime example in the investigations of possible nonlocal effects induced by time-dependent boundary conditions. It was initially suggested by Greenberger [12], and subsequently mentioned by several authors, eg [13][14][15][16][17][18], that time-dependent boundary conditions could give rise to a genuine form of nonlocality: a particle at rest and localized in the center of the box, remaining far from the moving walls, would nevertheless be physically displaced by the changing boundary conditions induced by the walls motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon thereafter the quantum mechanical version emerged in the area of quantum chaos. Another line of studies concerning this quantum mechanical system involves non-locality induced by the moving wall on a localized state [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] (for a recent disproof of this conjecture see [21].) Still another context of this system concerns chirped frequency excitations of quantum states, which were proposed in [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other works appeared, dealing with specific box shapes [44,45], aimed at giving proper mathematical treatment of the Schrödinger problem in the presence of moving boundaries [46], and exploring the raise of correlations between different particles confined in the same time-dependent potential [47]. Very recently, some works reporting on the numerical resolution of the dynamics of a particle confined in a one-dimensional box with moving walls has appeared [48,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%