According to random-matrix theory, interference effects in the conductance of a ballistic chaotic quantum dot should vanish ∝ (τ φ /τD) p when the dephasing time τ φ becomes small compared to the mean dwell time τD. Aleiner and Larkin have predicted that the power law crosses over to an exponential suppression ∝ exp(−τE/τ φ ) when τ φ drops below the Ehrenfest time τE. We report the first observation of this crossover in a computer simulation of universal conductance fluctuations. Their theory also predicts an exponential suppression ∝ exp(−τE/τD) in the absence of dephasing -which is not observed. We show that the effective random-matrix theory proposed previously for quantum dots without dephasing explains both observations. PACS numbers: 73.63.Kv, 03.65.Yz, 05.45.Mt An instructive way to classify quantum interference effects in mesoscopic conductors is to ask whether they depend exponentially or algebraically on the dephasing time τ φ . The Aharonov-Bohm effect is of the former class, while weak localization (WL) and universal conductance fluctuations (UCF) are of the latter class [1,2]. It is easy enough to understand the difference: On the one hand, Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in the magnetoconductance of a ring require phase coherence for a certain minimal time t min (the time it takes to circulate once along the ring), which becomes exponentially improbable if τ φ < t min . On the other hand, WL and UCF in a disordered quantum dot originate from multiple scattering on a broad range of time scales, not limited from below, and the superposition of exponents with a range of decay rates amounts to a power law decay.In a seminal paper [3], Aleiner and Larkin have argued that ballistic chaotic quantum dots are in a class of their own. In these systems the Ehrenfest time τ E introduces a lower limiting time scale for the interference effects, which are exponentially suppressed if τ φ < τ E . The physical picture is that electron wave packets in a chaotic system can be described by a single classical trajectory for a time up to τ E [4]. Both WL and UCF, however, require that a wave packet splits into partial waves which follow different trajectories before interfering. Only the fraction exp(−τ E /τ φ ) of electrons which have not yet dephased at time τ E can therefore contribute to WL and UCF.The WL correction ∆G = G − G cl is the deviation of the ensemble averaged conductance G (in zero magnetic field) from the classical value G cl = N/2. (We measure conductances in units of 2e 2 /h and assume an equal number of modes N ≫ 1 in the two leads that connect the quantum dot to electron reservoirs.) The WL correction according to random-matrix theory (RMT),has a power law suppression ∝ τ φ /τ D when τ φ becomes smaller than the mean dwell time τ D in the quantum dot [5]. Similarly, RMT predicts for the UCF a power law suppression ∝ (τ φ /τ D ) 2 of the mean-squared sample-tosample conductance fluctuations [5,6],with β = 2 (1) in the presence (absence) of a timereversal-symmetry-breaking magnetic field. Aleiner and ...