2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.045435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum description and emergence of nonlinearities in strongly coupled single-emitter nanoantenna systems

Abstract: Käll, M. et al (2018) Quantum description and emergence of nonlinearities in strongly coupled single-emitter nanoantenna systems PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 98(4) http://dx.Realizing strong coupling between a single quantum emitter (QE) and an optical cavity is of crucial importance in the context of various quantum optical applications. Although Rabi splitting of single quantum emitters coupled to high-Q classical cavities has been reported in numerous configurations, attaining single emitter Rabi splitting with a p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly the output coupling matrix L μη is connected to the radiative part of the QNM decay through the dissipationinduced radiative coupling matrix S rad μη . In contrast, in a phenomenologically dissipative JC output model, one assumes typically uncoupled output radiation, where each mode is coupled out to the surrounding environment independently [49,76]. In the following, we will compare the above formulas using the derived output electric field with the output intensity in a phenomenological dissipative JC modelĨ out = μĨ out μ withĨ out μ ≡ 2ω μ β rad (ω a )γ μ α † μα μ ss ,…”
Section: Output Far Field Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the output coupling matrix L μη is connected to the radiative part of the QNM decay through the dissipationinduced radiative coupling matrix S rad μη . In contrast, in a phenomenologically dissipative JC output model, one assumes typically uncoupled output radiation, where each mode is coupled out to the surrounding environment independently [49,76]. In the following, we will compare the above formulas using the derived output electric field with the output intensity in a phenomenological dissipative JC modelĨ out = μĨ out μ withĨ out μ ≡ 2ω μ β rad (ω a )γ μ α † μα μ ss ,…”
Section: Output Far Field Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, that we have phenomenologically included the (free-space or homogeneous background) spontaneous emission (γ) and pure dephasing (γ ) process of the TLS in Eq. (27).…”
Section: B Quantized Quasinormal Mode Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further complication is the often ad hoc quantization of the underlying plasmon modes. The most common treatment uses a driven Jaynes-Cumming (JC) model [25][26][27] , which has been used to compare different designs that are assumed to behave like a single mode JC model, then computing quantities like the degree of an-tibunching from a continuous wave (CW) driven system. Thus there is now a pressing need for a more fundamental theory for metallic resonators for SPS applications, and there is a rather urgent need to clarify and quantify the most useful figures of merit for plasmonic SPSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabi splitting between single quantum dots and dielectric high-Q microcavities was observed in a number of works but only at cryogenic temperatures [16,17]. Plasmonic nanocavities enable observation of strong coupling with quantum dots and organic chromophores at room temperatures [18][19][20][21][22], but most of such structures are at the border between the weak and the strong coupling regimes due to limited coupling strength [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results could potentially help in understanding the microscopic behavior of experimental observations of QE-plasmon systems such as those shown in Refs. [19,20], where a single emitter strong coupling was demonstrated but modeling the system with a single mode for the plasmonic response yields unrealistic values for the dipole moments of the QE [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%