Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2488608.2488718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum de finetti theorems under local measurements with applications

Abstract: Quantum de Finetti theorems are a useful tool in the study of correlations in quantum multipartite states. In this paper we prove two new quantum de Finetti theorems, both showing that under tests formed by local measurements in each of the subsystems one can get a much improved error dependence on the dimension of the subsystems. We also obtain similar results for non-signaling probability distributions. We give the following applications of the results to quantum complexity theory, polynomial optimization, a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(239 reference statements)
1
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• MULTI-QSEP-CIRCUIT, a multipartite generalization of QSEP-CIRCUIT, is also decidable by a twomessage quantum interactive proof system for a wide range of parameters. The analysis of the proof system exploits a recent quantum de Finetti theorem of Brandão and Harrow [40] along with the analysis used in the proof system for QSEP-CIRCUIT. MULTI-QSEP-CIRCUIT is also NP-and QSZK-hard because QSEP-CIRCUIT trivially reduces to it, as QSEP-CIRCUIT is merely a special case of MULTI-QSEP-CIRCUIT.…”
Section: Overview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• MULTI-QSEP-CIRCUIT, a multipartite generalization of QSEP-CIRCUIT, is also decidable by a twomessage quantum interactive proof system for a wide range of parameters. The analysis of the proof system exploits a recent quantum de Finetti theorem of Brandão and Harrow [40] along with the analysis used in the proof system for QSEP-CIRCUIT. MULTI-QSEP-CIRCUIT is also NP-and QSZK-hard because QSEP-CIRCUIT trivially reduces to it, as QSEP-CIRCUIT is merely a special case of MULTI-QSEP-CIRCUIT.…”
Section: Overview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that the Hamiltonians and the Bell inequalities we have studied have a finite interaction range, which in the TI case makes them particularly interesting from an experimentally-friendly perspective. Note that previous Bell inequalities for quantum many-body systems with low order correlators were specially designed for a permutationally invariant (PI) symmetry [25,26]; while being able to detect nonlocality in ground states of physical Hamiltonians such as the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick [43] or a spin-squeezed Bose-Einstein condensate [27], the information accessible to these inequalities is bound to a de Finetti theorem [44,45], thus becoming more compatible with that produced by a separable state as the system grows [26]. This requires to increase the number of measurements with the system size in order to close the finite-statistics loophole [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did not have a rounding algorithm, and in particular did not solve the problem of actually finding a separable state that approximately maximizes the probability of acceptance of a given one-way LOCC measurement. The techniques of the present paper were used by Brandão and Harrow [17] to solve the latter problem, and also greatly simplify the proof of [16]'s result, which originally involved relations between several measures of entanglement proved in several papers. 5 In an appendix to the full paper [11], we give a short proof of this result, specialized to the case of real vectors and polynomials of degree four (corresponding to quantum states of two systems, or two prover QMA proofs).…”
Section: Optimizing Polynomials With Nonnegative Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The paper[17] was based on a previous version of this work[10] that contained only the results for nonnegative tensors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%