2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2006.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum critical point, scaling and universality in high Tc (CaxLa1−x)(Ba2−c−xLac+x)Cu3Oy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another anomaly associated with x = 0.1 is the absence of a metallic transport at overdoping in y where T C = 0, as revealed by a minimum in the temperature dependence of (T). 51 Interpreted as absence of a quantum critical point in y, 51 this finding makes it difficult to treat formulations with x = 0.1 as a separate family of (Ca x La 1-x )(Ba 1.75-x La 0.25+x )Cu 3 O y compounds. The broadened transitions also create difficulties in quantifying a superconducting dome (T C vs y); for example, at x = 0.1 and y = 6.986, which is underdoped and above the minimum for superconductivity, the claimed T C value of about 16 K entered in the phase diagram corresponds to a specimen that is non-superconducting above 5 K and has a negative resistivity slope between 25 and 80 K (see Fig.…”
Section: B Inhomogeneous Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another anomaly associated with x = 0.1 is the absence of a metallic transport at overdoping in y where T C = 0, as revealed by a minimum in the temperature dependence of (T). 51 Interpreted as absence of a quantum critical point in y, 51 this finding makes it difficult to treat formulations with x = 0.1 as a separate family of (Ca x La 1-x )(Ba 1.75-x La 0.25+x )Cu 3 O y compounds. The broadened transitions also create difficulties in quantifying a superconducting dome (T C vs y); for example, at x = 0.1 and y = 6.986, which is underdoped and above the minimum for superconductivity, the claimed T C value of about 16 K entered in the phase diagram corresponds to a specimen that is non-superconducting above 5 K and has a negative resistivity slope between 25 and 80 K (see Fig.…”
Section: B Inhomogeneous Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both phase diagrams suggest no QCP inside the superconducting phase. Actually, it has reported that QCP may exist at around the end point of the superconducting phase when superconductivity has completely disappeared in CLBLCO, 128 SrD-La214, 129 OD-Tl2201, 130 and OD-Bi2212. 130 The UEPD is consistent with the idea that the pseudogap phase is, if not sufficient, necessary for the high T c .…”
Section: E Comparison Between the Unified Electronic Phase Diagram An...mentioning
confidence: 99%