2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.235327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum corrections to the conductivity in two-dimensional systems: Agreement between theory and experiment

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter k B T τ / in our experiment is varied from 0.04 to 3.8. (This value is 3.3-33 in [12], 1.7-5.6 in [15] and 0.004-0.18 in [14]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameter k B T τ / in our experiment is varied from 0.04 to 3.8. (This value is 3.3-33 in [12], 1.7-5.6 in [15] and 0.004-0.18 in [14]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, apart from the experiment [14] on low-mobility structures, these experiments were in fact performed not in the diffusive but ballistic regime, where Eq. 1 is not justified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that in the literature an empirical coefficient of order 2 is often introduced to bring the experimental data into better agreement with Eq. 4 10,19 . This model works well in metals, where Fermi-energy is large and the electron gas can be considered as being very uniform 4,5 , but a saturation of τ ϕ is usually reported at low temperatures (see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 The extraction of the EEI contribution depends on the successful determination of K ee from T-dependent conductivity measurements. However, such measurements typically also include corrections from other effects such as electron-phonon interactions and weak localization ͑WL͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%