2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.05887
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Control in the Unitary Sphere: Lambda-S1 and its Categorical Model

Abstract: In a recent paper, a realizability technique has been used to give a semantics of a quantum lambda calculus. Such a technique gives rise to an infinite number of valid typing rules, without giving preference to any subset of those. In this paper, we introduce a valid subset of typing rules, defining an expressive enough quantum calculus. Then, we propose a categorical semantics for it. Such a semantics consists of an adjunction between the category of semi-vector spaces of value distributions (that is, linear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another issue is to restrict the logic further so that linear functions are unitary. We can either enforce unitarity, following the methods of [1,6,7], or let these unitarity constraints as properties of the program that must be proved for each program, rather than enforced by the type system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue is to restrict the logic further so that linear functions are unitary. We can either enforce unitarity, following the methods of [1,6,7], or let these unitarity constraints as properties of the program that must be proved for each program, rather than enforced by the type system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, to enforce the linearity of proofs of Q ⇒ Q, we can, for instance, restrict them to proofs of the form λx (App M x), for some proof M of B ⇒ Q. Then, to enforce unitarity, we can restrict the construction of M to matrices such that the columns M 0 and M 1 are orthogonal closed irreducible proofs [19]- [21]. Although such restrictions are strong, they preserve the quantum completeness of the calculus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%