Design, Automation and Test in Europe
DOI: 10.1109/date.2005.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Circuit Simplification Using Templates

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I shows the quantum cost for a selection of Toffoli and Fredkin gate configurations as introduced in [32] and further optimized in [29] and [33]. As can be seen, gates of larger size are considerably more expensive than gates of smaller size.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I shows the quantum cost for a selection of Toffoli and Fredkin gate configurations as introduced in [32] and further optimized in [29] and [33]. As can be seen, gates of larger size are considerably more expensive than gates of smaller size.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for n ≥ 7, a C n−2 NOT gate can be simulated by 24n − 88 elementary gates with no auxiliary bits if there is at least one positive control [7,10]. On the other hand, for a C n−2 NOT with only negative controls, four additional elementary gates are required [10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a circuit of size n. For (n ≥ 5), a C m NOT gate (m ∈ {3, 4, · · · , n/2 }) can be simulated by 12m − 22 elementary gates if at least one positive control is available; otherwise, two extra elementary gates are required [7,10]. In addition, for n ≥ 7, a C n−2 NOT gate can be simulated by 24n − 88 elementary gates with no auxiliary bits if there is at least one positive control [7,10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations