1994
DOI: 10.1063/1.46614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-Chemical calculations on molecules of astrochemical interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding frequency differences ( GHFF -ab initio ) for modes 1 to 6 of CH 3 Cl, using the MP4 results of Harris (5), are ϩ3, Ϫ1, ϩ16, Ϫ10, Ϫ2, and 0 cm Ϫ1 , respectively. Harmonic vibration frequencies (but not force constants) are available also from a CEPA-1 calculation (6). Comparison with the latter shows a similar close agreement, yielding differences of ϩ4, 0, ϩ9, Ϫ4, Ϫ8, and Ϫ7 cm Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Ghff Of Methyl Chloridesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The corresponding frequency differences ( GHFF -ab initio ) for modes 1 to 6 of CH 3 Cl, using the MP4 results of Harris (5), are ϩ3, Ϫ1, ϩ16, Ϫ10, Ϫ2, and 0 cm Ϫ1 , respectively. Harmonic vibration frequencies (but not force constants) are available also from a CEPA-1 calculation (6). Comparison with the latter shows a similar close agreement, yielding differences of ϩ4, 0, ϩ9, Ϫ4, Ϫ8, and Ϫ7 cm Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Ghff Of Methyl Chloridesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)) and references cited therein), it is only comparatively recently that the anharmonic corrections required for comparison with empirical vibration frequencies have been quantitatively understood (7,8). These advances in the understanding of the vibrational anharmonicities (including Fermi resonance effects) for the methyl halides (7)(8)(9)(10) and the large number of new and improved high-resolution spectroscopic data now available (in particular axial centrifugal distortion constants D K ) make a recalculation of the empirical general harmonic force field (GHFF) of methyl chloride appropriate at this time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several more extensive ab initio calculations on, among others, reactions (2) and (3) restricted to stationary points have been reported: while Glukhovtsev et al [64,65] made use of the G2(+ ) level of theory, Botschwina, [66] Schmatz et al, [67] and Parthiban et al [68] employed coupled cluster methods. The system: F À + CH 3 Cl was also studied by Botschwina et al [69] A recent CCSD(T) study with large basis sets, performed by Gonzales et al, [70] deals with the systems F À + CH 3 X (with X = F, Cl, CN, OH, SH, NH 2 , PH 2 ). Four-dimensional analytical representations of CCSD(T) PESs have been provided for the systems Cl À + CH 3 Cl [71,72] and Cl À + CH 3 Br.…”
Section: Full-dimensional Potential Energy Surfaces Based On Low-levementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Owing mainly to the neglect of core-valence and core-core correlation eects, this value appears to be slightly too long. The same sort of calculations for CH 3 Cl yields R e (CeCl) 1.7821 A Ê , r e (CeH) 1.0853 A Ê , and b e (HeCeCl) 108.43°, which can be compared with our recommended equilibrium geometry values [6] of 1.7762 A Ê , 1.0836 A Ê and 108.58°. Assuming the same error to hold for the CCSD(T) value of the CCl distance at the saddle point, we arrive at R s 2.301 A Ê .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ®rst one (basis A) consists of 248 contracted Gaussian-type orbitals (cGTOs) and is the same as used in our previous investigation of the reaction F A + CH 3 Cl ® FCH 3 + Cl A [6]. It is comprised of the (s, p, d, f) functions of the aug-cc-pVQZ basis of Dunning and coworkers [7±9] for carbon and chlorine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%