2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-behaved discrete multi-objective particle swarm optimization for complex network clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors noted that the experiments provided high quality solutions for time-cost optimization of large size projects within seconds and enabled optimal planning of real life-size projects. Li et al [199] modeled complex network clustering as a multi-objective optimization problem and applied a quantum inspired discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm with nondominated sorting for individual replacement to solve it. Experimental results illustrated its competitiveness against some state-of-the-art approaches on the extensions of Girvan and Newman benchmarks [200] as well as many real-world networks.…”
Section: Some Application Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors noted that the experiments provided high quality solutions for time-cost optimization of large size projects within seconds and enabled optimal planning of real life-size projects. Li et al [199] modeled complex network clustering as a multi-objective optimization problem and applied a quantum inspired discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm with nondominated sorting for individual replacement to solve it. Experimental results illustrated its competitiveness against some state-of-the-art approaches on the extensions of Girvan and Newman benchmarks [200] as well as many real-world networks.…”
Section: Some Application Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (10), it can be deduced that the sum of r i (t) is 1 and r i (t) is between 0 and 1 at iteration t. When the sum of the objective function value corresponding to all particles is 0, the coefficient r i (t) is 1/S. Otherwise, the smaller f i obj (t) is, the larger r i (t) is.…”
Section: Weighted Mean Personal Best Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike PSO, QPSO needs no velocity vectors for particles, and also has fewer parameters to adjust, making it easier to implement. Since QPSO was proposed, it has attracted much attention and different variants of QPSO have been proposed to enhance the performance from different aspects and successfully applied to solve a wide range of continuous optimization problems [9][10][11][12][13][14]. In general, most current QPSO variants can be classified into three categories [15]: the improvement based on operators from other evolutionary algorithms, hybrid search methods, and cooperative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. Li, Jiao, Zhao, Shang, and Gong () proposed a quantum‐behaved (Wright & Jordanov, ), discrete multi‐objective particle swarm optimization for complex network clustering with the ability to determine automatically the number of clusters. The two objective functions used were the kernel k means, which is the sum density of links of intraclusters, and the ratio cut, which is defined as the sum densities of links of interclusters.…”
Section: Meta‐heuristic Multi‐ and Many‐objective Algorithms Applied mentioning
confidence: 99%