2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.72.052111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum averages of weak values

Abstract: We re-examine the status of the weak value of a quantum mechanical observable as an objective physical concept, addressing its physical interpretation and general domain of applicability. We show that the weak value can be regarded as a definite mechanical effect on a measuring probe specifically designed to minimize the back-reaction on the measured system. We then present a new framework for general measurement conditions (where the back-reaction on the system may not be negligible) in which the measurement … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…WMs on box C will record the "paradoxical," non-classical outcome of −1. WVs like this outside the eigenvalue spectrum cannot be reproduced from any positive definite probability distribution of eigenvalues [31,14,30].…”
Section: Contextuality and Pps-paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WMs on box C will record the "paradoxical," non-classical outcome of −1. WVs like this outside the eigenvalue spectrum cannot be reproduced from any positive definite probability distribution of eigenvalues [31,14,30].…”
Section: Contextuality and Pps-paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Time-symmetry versus time-asymmetry: The HVT approach utilized in [25] focuses on the probability of post-selection and brings in an element of time-asymmetry, apparently endemic to a Bayesian approach [14].…”
Section: Hvts and Ppssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relation is equivalent to that discussed in Ref. [18], where the correspondence is given by Ŵ f i ↔ p 1b and P suc ( f |i) ↔ P 1b (φ) with p 1b and P 1b (φ) being defined in Ref. [18].…”
Section: Measurement Process For the Average Value A F Imentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[18], where the correspondence is given by Ŵ f i ↔ p 1b and P suc ( f |i) ↔ P 1b (φ) with p 1b and P 1b (φ) being defined in Ref. [18]. To show that the average value Ŵ f i of the pointer observable is proportional to the conditional average A f i of the system observableÂ, we assume that the apparatus state |ψ a of the s-part is an eigenstate of the pointer observableX such thatX |ψ a = ga|ψ a and ψ a |ψ a = δ aa with some scaling parameter g. Then we have…”
Section: Measurement Process For the Average Value A F Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10]. We will now show that, using just two qubits, we can get perfect quantitative evidence of the weak value as an objective dynamic quantity of the usual sense.…”
Section: Two Qubit Dynamical Test Of the Weak Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%