2016
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/37/4/045403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum and classical probability distributions for arbitrary Hamiltonians

Abstract: In the limit of large quantum excitations, the classical and quantum probability distributions for a Schrödinger equation can be compared by using the corresponding WKBJ solutions whose rapid oscillations are averaged. This result is extended for one-dimensional Hamiltonians with a non-usual kinetic part. The validity of the approach is tested with a Hamiltonian containing a relativistic kinetic energy operator.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not clear how accurately one needs to sample from Boltzmann distributions for machine learning, or even that Boltzmann distributions are optimal for this purpose. A tantalizing research direction is the use of distributions that have a large quantum component [2], particularly given that certain distributions generated by quantum Hamiltonians are believed to have no efficient classical sampling mechanism [27,28]. A deeper understanding of these processes will have profound implications for the design of future annealers and the prospects of utilizing quantum annealers as efficient Boltzmann samplers for machine learning and beyond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear how accurately one needs to sample from Boltzmann distributions for machine learning, or even that Boltzmann distributions are optimal for this purpose. A tantalizing research direction is the use of distributions that have a large quantum component [2], particularly given that certain distributions generated by quantum Hamiltonians are believed to have no efficient classical sampling mechanism [27,28]. A deeper understanding of these processes will have profound implications for the design of future annealers and the prospects of utilizing quantum annealers as efficient Boltzmann samplers for machine learning and beyond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might also argue that our results are merely a consequence of the fact that, even for a single energy eigenstate, there is typically a close correspondence between the quantum position distribution and a classically defined probability distribution associated with the given energy [23][24][25][26]. However, this fact cannot fully explain our observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To the author's best knowledge, the first generalization of the WKB method to relativistic Hamiltonian was presented in ref. [26], where the WKB probability distributions for Hamiltonians involving arbitrary kinetic energy are derived. In particular the kinetic term √ m 2 + p 2 and its m → 0 limit were discussed in [26], in the context of the HO.…”
Section: Approximate Wkb Results and Exact Analytical Results For M →mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26], where the WKB probability distributions for Hamiltonians involving arbitrary kinetic energy are derived. In particular the kinetic term √ m 2 + p 2 and its m → 0 limit were discussed in [26], in the context of the HO.…”
Section: Approximate Wkb Results and Exact Analytical Results For M →mentioning
confidence: 99%