2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.80.022340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum algorithm for approximating partition functions

Abstract: We achieve a quantum speed-up of fully polynomial randomized approximation schemes (FPRAS) for estimating partition functions that combine simulated annealing with the Monte-Carlo Markov Chain method and use non-adaptive cooling schedules. The improvement in time complexity is twofold: a quadratic reduction with respect to the spectral gap of the underlying Markov chains and a quadratic reduction with respect to the parameter characterizing the desired accuracy of the estimate output by the FPRAS. Both reducti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article we give a rigorous lower bound for the evolution time (or cost) of adiabatic processes that prepare the final state. This bound is also valid for more general quantum evolutions [5,6,11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this article we give a rigorous lower bound for the evolution time (or cost) of adiabatic processes that prepare the final state. This bound is also valid for more general quantum evolutions [5,6,11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This assertion is quantified via the adiabatic approximation [2], which provides a relation between the rate of change of the perturbation and the fidelity of the evolved state with the final eigenstate. The adiabatic approximation is a key part of quantum computing as it determines the complexity of several quantum algorithms [3][4][5][6]. In fact, adiabatic quantum computation [3], in which the result of a problem is encoded in the ground state of a (final) Hamiltonian, is equivalent to standard quantum computation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whether efficient quantum algorithms exist for preparing ferromagnetic thermal states is as far as we know an open problem but if so than corner magnetisation measurement could prove a useful diagnostic for such algorithms since classical FPRAS is available. Finally, we add that recently quantum algorithms for FPRAS were found which exhibit a quadratic speed up over the classical counterparts [40]. These algorithms are rather different in spirit from measuring corner magnetisation as instead of using mixed states they use a combination of Grover search and phase estimation to prepare pure states of many qubit systems which coherently encode probability distributions of various classical spin configurations.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%