Quantizing constrained systems

Abstract

We consider quantum mechanics on constrained surfaces which have non-Euclidean metrics and variable Gaussian curvature. The old controversy about the ambiguities involving terms in the Hamiltonian of order ប 2 multiplying the Gaussian curvature is addressed. We set out to clarify the matter by considering constraints to be the limits of large restoring forces as the constraint coordinates deviate from their constrained values. We find additional ambiguous terms of order ប 2 involving freedom in the constraining potentials, demonstrating that the classical constrained Hamiltonian or Lagrangian cannot uniquely specify the quantization: the ambiguity of directly quantizing a constrained system is inherently unresolvable. However, there is never any problem with a physical quantum system, which cannot have infinite constraint forces and always fluctuates around the mean constraint values. The issue is addressed from the perspectives of adiabatic approximations in quantum mechanics and Feynman path integrals, and semiclassically in terms of adiabatic actions.

Curvature-Induced Rashba Spin–orbit Interaction in Strain-Driven Nanostructures

“…From a purely theoretical point of view, the problem of the quantum motion of a particle living in a curved space has represented a matter of controversy for a long time [5][6][7][8] . The problem arises because Dirac quantization on a curved manifold leads to operator-ordering ambiguities 5 .…”

Curvature-induced toroidal bound states

“…In this limit the wave function is expected to decouple into surface and normal parts, or in the language of [13], into "fast" and "slow"…”

Curvature-induced bound states and coherent electron transport on the surface of a truncated cone

“…(2) is separated into normal and surface components where the first term in Eq. (7) stands for the kinetic term of the surface component [2,16,29], and…”