1975
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1975.1162687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantization errors in the fast Fourier transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one is the typical one, for which the coefficients are not scaled (Non-scaled). The second one (Truncated one [15]) is an approximation of Non-scaled that substitutes the value Fig. 4 are normalized.…”
Section: B Example Of Application: Fftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the typical one, for which the coefficients are not scaled (Non-scaled). The second one (Truncated one [15]) is an approximation of Non-scaled that substitutes the value Fig. 4 are normalized.…”
Section: B Example Of Application: Fftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The truncation of SOPOT coefficients appears to be equivalent to coefficient quantization problems of various transforms in the literature, such as [4,9,16], which have attracted the attention of many researchers. However, these results cannot be applied to our scheme for the following reasons.…”
Section: Truncation Noise Shaping Of Sopot Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In statistical model based approaches [9,16], these truncation errors are assumed as independent random variables with mean value of zero and their cross terms will vanish for the expectation of sum of truncation noises. In our work, however, these errors are subject to the orthogonal conditions, and they cannot be assumed as independent random variables with mean value of zero.…”
Section: Modeling the Noise From A Series Of Ifft Coefficient Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De ne Y = Yr + jYi as the original output and Q(Y ) as the quantized output, the mean square error (MSE) of numerical decomposition is expressed as in Eq. (9). Similarly, the MSE of direct implementation can also be simply derived as 4σ 2 .…”
Section: Iii-a Quantization Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…James [9] derived the xed-point MSE analysis of quantization loss for mixed-radix FFT algorithms with conventional complex multipliers. Perlow and Denk [10] proposed an error propagation model to estimate the performance of nite wordlength FFT architecture.…”
Section: Iv-a Quantitive Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%