2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0308210506000096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantization effects for a fourth-order equation of exponential growth in dimension $4$

Abstract: We investigate the asymptotic behavior as k → +∞ of sequences (u k ) k∈N ∈ C 4 (Ω) of solutions of the equations ∆ 2 u k = V k e 4u k on Ω, where Ω is a bounded domain of R 4 and lim k→+∞ V k = 1 in C 0 loc (Ω). The corresponding 2-dimensional problem was studied by Brézis-Merle and Li-Shafrir who pointed out that there is a quantization of the energy when blow-up occurs. As shown by Adimurthi, Struwe and the author [1], such a quantization does not hold in dimension four for the problem in its full generality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown by Robert [18], the same result holds if for some open subset ∅ = ω ⊂ we have the a priori bounds…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let Be a Bounded Domain Of R 2 And Let (U K ) Ksupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown by Robert [18], the same result holds if for some open subset ∅ = ω ⊂ we have the a priori bounds…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let Be a Bounded Domain Of R 2 And Let (U K ) Ksupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Also in the radially symmetric case there is a complete description of the possible concentration patterns; see [18].…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let Be a Bounded Domain Of R 2 And Let (U K ) Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[BM] and [LS]), on S 2 (see [Str4]) and to the prescribed Q-curvature equation in dimension 2m (see e.g. [DR], [Mal], [MS], [Ndi], [Rob1], [Rob2], [Mar3], [Mar4]). For instance consider the following model problem.…”
Section: Concentration Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, with (3.4), we get that û k L 1 (Ω) ≤ C for all k ∈ N. It then follows from Theorem 1.2 of [35] that there existsû ∈ C 4 (Ω) such that lim k→+∞ûk =û in C 3 loc (Ω). Therefore S ⊂ ∂Ω.…”
Section: Claimmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It follows from Theorem 1.2 of [35] that there exists S 1 ⊂ Ω, where S 1 is at most finite, such thatû k ≤ C(ω) uniformly in ω for ω ⊂⊂ Ω\S 1 . Therefore, with (3.4), we get that (α k ) cannot go to −∞ when k → +∞.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%