1980
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740310209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantities and quality of protein extracted from pasture herbage using heat precipitation or ultrafiltration procedures

Abstract: Permanent pasture stands in northern Victoria (Australia) were used for protein extraction in both laboratory-scale and plant-scale operations during the spring, surnmerandautumnseasons. Mixedherbagewasinits third,fourth,fifthandsixthweeks of regrowth. Efficiency of the protein extraction process at different stages of herbage maturity was measured, as well as the proximate analysis, amino acid composition, availability of lysine, methionine, tryptophan and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of the protein, recove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, red and white clover LPC showed no increase in protein digestibility due to LPC processing (Stødkilde et al., 2019). Pasture LPC prepared by ultrafiltration showed a protein digestibility of 78%, whereas LPC prepared by thermo‐coagulation has a protein digestibility of 73% (Ostrowski‐Meissner, 1980). Therefore, choosing the right processing method is necessary to obtain the highest protein digestibility and eliminate the maximum quantity of anti‐nutritional factors in the plant leaf matrix.…”
Section: Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, red and white clover LPC showed no increase in protein digestibility due to LPC processing (Stødkilde et al., 2019). Pasture LPC prepared by ultrafiltration showed a protein digestibility of 78%, whereas LPC prepared by thermo‐coagulation has a protein digestibility of 73% (Ostrowski‐Meissner, 1980). Therefore, choosing the right processing method is necessary to obtain the highest protein digestibility and eliminate the maximum quantity of anti‐nutritional factors in the plant leaf matrix.…”
Section: Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of ryegrass, 59% of crude protein was obtained through the ultrafiltration technique which is much higher than the heat coagulation technique with a yield of 45% (Koschuh et al., 2004). Protein concentrates of pasture leaves obtained using a DIAFLO membrane having an MWCO of 20 kDa were reported to have a better yield of the native protein, total essential amino acids, threonine, lysine, tryptophan content, and tryptophan availability when compared with LPC produced by steam coagulation at 85°C (Ostrowski‐Meissner, 1980). Ultrafiltration is also capable of removing anti‐nutritional and toxic compounds found in leaf extracts.…”
Section: Extraction Isolation and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrafiltration can be used to concentrate protein from leaf juice, producing the same protein yields as heat precipitation. Ultrafiltration has been performed on Alamo switch-grass in combination with alkaline extraction and diafiltration has been used to concentrate protein and lower the salt content in the leaf juice from Atriplex lampa . , Different microfiltration and ultrafiltration systems were tested by Zhang, Grimi et al (2015) for concentration of protein in alfalfa juice, and microfiltration was suggested to be the most efficient method to concentrate the protein. These results correlate with our own preliminary data, which suggests that fouling of the microfiltration membrane results in protein concentration.…”
Section: Precipitation/concentration Of Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%