1961
DOI: 10.2307/1292664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Zoology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated univariate statistics, including coefficients of variation, are shown in Online Supplementary Material Table 3; these results are calculated from the measurements of upper (Online Supplementary Material Table 4) and lower (Online Supplementary Material Table 5) dentition of extant bandicoots. Coefficient of variation of dental dimensions for Bulungu palara generally fall within expected levels (4-10; Simpson et al 1960) for a single, mixed- sex, normally-distributed population (Online Supplementary Material Table 3), except for p3 (CV = 12.79) and P3 (CV = 15.73) width and M4 (CV = 11.67) length. This is consistent with results from modern bandicoot species, where coefficients of variation for p3, P3 and M4 are also in many cases higher than 10.…”
Section: Morphotype Analysismentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Calculated univariate statistics, including coefficients of variation, are shown in Online Supplementary Material Table 3; these results are calculated from the measurements of upper (Online Supplementary Material Table 4) and lower (Online Supplementary Material Table 5) dentition of extant bandicoots. Coefficient of variation of dental dimensions for Bulungu palara generally fall within expected levels (4-10; Simpson et al 1960) for a single, mixed- sex, normally-distributed population (Online Supplementary Material Table 3), except for p3 (CV = 12.79) and P3 (CV = 15.73) width and M4 (CV = 11.67) length. This is consistent with results from modern bandicoot species, where coefficients of variation for p3, P3 and M4 are also in many cases higher than 10.…”
Section: Morphotype Analysismentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The bivariate coefficients of allometry were interpreted as growth rates of a specific cranial variable, although they actually represent rates of size increase (Simpson et al 1960;Gould 1966;Nelson 1978;Cassini et al 2012). Thus, it was ultimately assumed that intraspecific allometry of size closely reflects true allometry of growth.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses were conducted using the species' average for TLV and HV. To linearize scaling relationships (Simpson et al, 2003), the cube‐root of TLV and HV were calculated then converted to natural logarithmic units (base e ). To accommodate the potential influence of phylogeny, Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) regression used a consensus anthropoid tree modified from Version 3 of 10 K Trees (Arnold et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%