2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01046.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative X‐ray projection microscopy: phase‐contrast and multi‐spectral imaging

Abstract: SummaryWe outline a new approach to X-ray projection microscopy in a scanning electron microscope (SEM), which exploits phase contrast to boost the quality and information content of images. These developments have been made possible by the combination of a high-brightness field-emission gun (FEG)-based SEM, direct detection CCD technology and new phase retrieval algorithms. Using this approach we have been able to obtain spatial resolution of < 0.2 µ m and have demonstrated novel features such as: (i) phase-c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To record projection propagation images in full field mode the sample (for an optical micrograph of the cells, see Figure 1(a)) was placed at a (defocus) distance z 1 = 8 mm from the WG exit plane, where the divergent WG beam has broadened to a field of view (FOV) of 40 × 40 μm 2 , as calculated from the measured far-field divergence angle of 5 mrad. As shown previously, the imaging experiment can then be described in a well-known equivalent parallel-beam geometry (Mayo et al 2002;Fuhse et al 2006) with a demagnified (effective) detector pixel size of D /M and a (de)magnification factor of M = (z 1 + z 2 )/z 1 as well as an effective sample-detector distance z eff = z 1 z 2 /(z 1 + z 2 ) = z 2 /M. Note that here z 2 z 1 , so that z eff z 1 = 8 mm and M z 2 /z 1 = 660, resulting in an effective detector pixel size of 83 nm.…”
Section: Figure 1 Experimental Setup (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To record projection propagation images in full field mode the sample (for an optical micrograph of the cells, see Figure 1(a)) was placed at a (defocus) distance z 1 = 8 mm from the WG exit plane, where the divergent WG beam has broadened to a field of view (FOV) of 40 × 40 μm 2 , as calculated from the measured far-field divergence angle of 5 mrad. As shown previously, the imaging experiment can then be described in a well-known equivalent parallel-beam geometry (Mayo et al 2002;Fuhse et al 2006) with a demagnified (effective) detector pixel size of D /M and a (de)magnification factor of M = (z 1 + z 2 )/z 1 as well as an effective sample-detector distance z eff = z 1 z 2 /(z 1 + z 2 ) = z 2 /M. Note that here z 2 z 1 , so that z eff z 1 = 8 mm and M z 2 /z 1 = 660, resulting in an effective detector pixel size of 83 nm.…”
Section: Figure 1 Experimental Setup (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown [96,110] that, to first order inφ andã, the 2D Fourier transform of the propagated intensity, I (r ⊥ ; z) = |ψ(r ⊥ ; z)| 2 , is given as…”
Section: Near Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brilliance provided by thirdgeneration synchrotron light sources [5] that enabled soft X-ray microscopy also facilitated the development of coherent X-ray imaging techniques at photon energies beyond 10 keV, such as Zernike phase-contrast microscopy [6], coherent diffractive imaging [7], ptychography [8,9], and projection microscopy [10]. Lensless techniques of ptychography and diffractive imaging are able to retrieve three-dimensional images with the desired resolutions of several nanometers by using spatially coherent hard X-ray beams with high penetration power and without limitations of depth of focus [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%