2020
DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.10.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative X-ray fluorescence imaging of gold nanoparticles using joint L1 and total variation regularized reconstruction

Abstract: Background: This work proposed a joint L1 and total variation (TV) regularized reconstruction method for X-ray fluorescence tomography (XFT), and investigated the performance of this method in quantitative imaging of gold nanoparticles (GNPs). Methods:We developed a dual-modality XFT/CT imaging system which consisted of a benchtop X-ray source, a translation/rotation stage, a silicon drift detector for X-ray fluorescence (XRF) detection, and a flat panel detector for transmission X-ray detection. A pencil-beam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, sparsity in form of total variation (TV) can be incorporated into XFCT reconstruction. As demonstrated in our previously published study [34], combining with L1 regularization, TV could complementarily maintain the local smoothness and preserve the shape of targets. Nevertheless, it is challenging to select the optimal regularization parameters for both L1 and TV, in the scenarios of XFCT with different number of projection views.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, sparsity in form of total variation (TV) can be incorporated into XFCT reconstruction. As demonstrated in our previously published study [34], combining with L1 regularization, TV could complementarily maintain the local smoothness and preserve the shape of targets. Nevertheless, it is challenging to select the optimal regularization parameters for both L1 and TV, in the scenarios of XFCT with different number of projection views.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%