2013
DOI: 10.3171/2012.9.jns09186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative verification of the keyhole concept: a comparison of area of exposure in the parasellar region via supraorbital keyhole, frontotemporal pterional, and supraorbital approaches

Abstract: The area of exposure of the parasellar region through the smaller supraorbital keyhole approach is as adequate as the larger pterional and supraorbital approaches. The keyhole concept can be verified quantitatively as follows: 1) a wide area of exposure on the skull base can be obtained through a small keyhole skull opening, and 2) the side opposite the opening can also be visualized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the setting of vascular pathologies, there may be some difficulty with using two suction tubes in managing prematurely ruptured aneurysms or to obtain proximal control [13, 22, 46, 47]. Some have even recommended against this approach for vascular lesions for this reason [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the setting of vascular pathologies, there may be some difficulty with using two suction tubes in managing prematurely ruptured aneurysms or to obtain proximal control [13, 22, 46, 47]. Some have even recommended against this approach for vascular lesions for this reason [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prominent orbital rim may impede the surgical degree of freedom, and some authors have advocated the addition of an orbital osteotomy to improve surgical freedom and access for vascular pathologies [16, 48]. A similar concept led to similar adaptations to traditional approaches to frontal base and parasellar lesions in the past [46, 4952]. A number of authors have described different vascular pathologies safely treated through this approach, but we feel it should be limited to those with significant experience with the approach, and it may not be the best approach for some lesions (such as in subarachnoid hemorrhage, giant aneurysms, or vascular lesions in the posterior circulation) in comparison to more traditional approaches (see Table 1) [13, 22, 46, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When compared with a standard pterional approach, the area of exposure of the parasellar region through a superciliary keyhole approach has already been quantitatively verified as adequate and similar2). In addition, surgical minimalism with tailoring the exposure to the patient's anatomy and surgical lesion has led to the application of a superciliary keyhole approach5), which offers many advantages as follows : 1) small (3.5 cm) operative wound, 2) short operative duration due to the short cranial opening and closing time, 3) less intraoperative blood loss, 4) rarer occurrence of an epidural hematoma, 5) minimal damage to the temporalis muscle, 6) rarer occurrence of wound dehiscence or wound related pain, and 7) early return to work and normal life121314).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%