2003
DOI: 10.1002/mus.10384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative ultrasonography of skeletal muscles in children: Normal values

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to establish normal values of muscle thickness, ratio of muscle thickness to subcutaneous fat thickness, and muscle echo intensity in children between 11 weeks and 16 years of age. Transverse scans of four muscles were made by standardized real-time ultrasound examination. The scans were digitized, and mean echo intensity was measured using gray-scale analysis. A multiple regression equation was used to study which independent parameter (age, height, weight, or sex) influenced the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
190
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
190
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, anisotropy or angular dependence can also affect the echogenicity of an imaged structure [10]. In this study, we tried to minimise the effects of anisotropy by aligning the transducer at right angles to the forearm bones so that it produced maximum echogenicity of the bones and the median nerve, a method that has previously been described [4,5,7,11], and used the average of three EI measurements of the MN and FMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, anisotropy or angular dependence can also affect the echogenicity of an imaged structure [10]. In this study, we tried to minimise the effects of anisotropy by aligning the transducer at right angles to the forearm bones so that it produced maximum echogenicity of the bones and the median nerve, a method that has previously been described [4,5,7,11], and used the average of three EI measurements of the MN and FMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this fact, the above result brings up the question of the validity of using ultrasonic muscle thickness determined at rest to evaluate individual differences in muscle size. In previous studies, muscle thickness measurements with ultrasonography have been performed in standing (Abe et al, 1994;Akagi et al, 2010;Kubo et al, 2003aKubo et al, , 2003bMiyatani et al, 2003Miyatani et al, , 2004Pinkoski et al, 2006;Toji and Kaneko, 2007;Wakahara et al, 2010), supine (Ainscough-Potts et al, 2006;Arts et al, 2010;Campbell et al, 1995;Pillen et al, 2003Pillen et al, , 2007Reimers et al, 1998;Scholten et al, 2003), or prone (Candow and Chilibeck, 2005;Candow et al, 2006;Mohagheghi et al, 2007;Reimers et al, 1998) positions. In the standing position, the gravitational force acted on the muscles of interest in the proximal-distal direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Muscle thickness measurement using B-mode ultrasound has been used in several studies in normal children. 15,16 It is a reliable method in normal children for the quadriceps femoris 15 and in young adults for muscles of the upper arm, forearm, abdomen, back, thigh, and calf. 23 The present study showed a significant correlation between MTQ and GMFM-66 scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This positioning was easy to maintain even for children with severe knee flexion contracture. As previously described, 15,16 transverse ultrasound images of the quadriceps femoris were used to measure the MTQ. The transducer was positioned at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and the proximal end of the patella.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%