1996
DOI: 10.1116/1.588486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative two-dimensional dopant profiles obtained directly from secondary electron images

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inHigh resolution quantitative two-dimensional dopant mapping using energy-filtered secondary electron imaging Doping-dependent contrast in secondary electron images of p/n junctions in silicon obtained in a field-emission scanning electron microscope was observed and characterized. The optimum experimental conditions for observing this ''electronic'' contrast were established by investigating the effect of microscope and material parameters on the magnitude of the contrast. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40, 41, and 42 demonstrate the weakness of the selective-etch/TEM approach, i.e., its lack of contrast at doping concentrations of less than 10 19 atoms cm Ϫ3 . Another electron microscopy based approach uses scanning electron microscopy 139 in which the variation of secondary electron yield with dopant concentration is used to give a dopantdependent image of the area of interest, again prepared in cross section.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Depth Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40, 41, and 42 demonstrate the weakness of the selective-etch/TEM approach, i.e., its lack of contrast at doping concentrations of less than 10 19 atoms cm Ϫ3 . Another electron microscopy based approach uses scanning electron microscopy 139 in which the variation of secondary electron yield with dopant concentration is used to give a dopantdependent image of the area of interest, again prepared in cross section.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Depth Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrast between the p-and n-type semiconductor (mostly silicon) was found to reach as much as 10%. Its existence has been proven throughout the electron energy range usual for SEM, and some authors detected maximum contrast at low energies such as 1 keV [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over the last decade attention has been devoted to direct secondary electron (SE) imaging of dopants [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The contrast between the p-and n-type semiconductor (mostly silicon) was found to reach as much as 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, whereas the contrast of the p-type region is significantly larger, that of the n-type region is significantly smaller than what has been reported for similar concentrations. 11,15 It seems that dopant contrast has been shifted sideways and SE emission is enhanced for both pand n-type regions in real MOS devices. This intriguing phenomena must therefore be related to the different structures involved, either the heterostructures of STI or the Co silicide at the junctions between the blank wafers and MOS devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%