2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02254.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative trait locus analyses and the study of evolutionary process

Abstract: The past decade has seen a proliferation of studies that employ quantitative trait locus (QTL) approaches to diagnose the genetic basis of trait evolution. Advances in molecular techniques and analytical methods have suggested that an exact genetic description of the number and distribution of genes affecting a trait can be obtained. Although this possibility has met with some success in model systems such as Drosophila and Arabidopsis , the pursuit of an exact description of QTL effects, i.e. individual gene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
189
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
3
189
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The QTL for hatch timing had a particularly low PEV, explaining only 4.5% of the variation. Sample sizes below 300, as used here, typically have low power to identify QTL of small effect particularly at marker densities less than 15 cM (Erickson et al, 2004). Non-model organisms or outbred populations often have lower density linkage maps that increase the probability of failing to detect small effect QTL, if they exist (Lynch and Walsh, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The QTL for hatch timing had a particularly low PEV, explaining only 4.5% of the variation. Sample sizes below 300, as used here, typically have low power to identify QTL of small effect particularly at marker densities less than 15 cM (Erickson et al, 2004). Non-model organisms or outbred populations often have lower density linkage maps that increase the probability of failing to detect small effect QTL, if they exist (Lynch and Walsh, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outbred designs have the ability to expose more of the variation present in the originating populations because multiple QTL alleles can segregate in experimental families, thus potentially uncovering more evolutionarily important variation than inbred designs (Erickson et al, 2004). Response to selection on correlated traits in experiments using inbred lines has often differed from the predicted response given the correlations observed between the traits studied (Roff, 2007a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, LD mapping relies on surveys of genetic polymorphism data from a collection of samples (inbred lines, accessions, individuals and populations) to test for statistical associations between these genetic markers and particular phenotypes, again based on the premise that the marker(s) is in LD with the causal locus, or less likely, is in fact the causal mutation itself (Box 1; see Mackay, 2001;Clark, 2003;Mitchell-Olds and Schmitt, 2006). By contrast, in a QTL mapping approach, statistical analyses of genome-wide molecular markers and phenotypes measured in progeny of controlled crosses are used to identify chromosomal regions contributing to phenotypic differentiation (reviewed in Mackay, 2001;Erickson et al, 2004).…”
Section: New Contributions From Quantitative Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These statistics serve to illustrate the dynamics more clearly and highlight that surviving deleterious mutants may, on average, occupy more patches and have higher total abundance than an average surviving neutral mutant (Table 1, Figure 3). As a greater range of methods are developed to describe empirical patterns of quantitative genetic variation (for example, Mauricio, 2001;Erickson et al, 2004), there will be considerable potential to use these, together with data on neutral markers, to improve inferences regarding past range expansions. These empirical data can only give us a picture of mutations that have survived until today, and simulations that can produce expected patterns of surviving neutral and non-neutral genetic diversity will be needed if we are to best use the additional information that new quantitative genetic methods will provide.…”
Section: Oj Burton and Jmj Travismentioning
confidence: 99%