2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Three-Dimensional Color Flow Echocardiography of Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: New Methods, New Perspectives, New Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these factors are not specific for severe MR and should be interpreted in the context of the complete evaluation of the patients. Finally, the use of 3D echocardiography is recommended to overpass some of the pitfalls encountered with 2D examination: the 3D color acquisition of MR allows the direct planimetry of the vena contracta (i.e., regurgitant orifice area) and therefore optimizes the assessment of MR in the context of non-hemispherical PISA shells and multiple jets (Table 1) (19,92,(95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101). Recent method proposes to use 3D color Doppler to measure mitral inflow and LV outflow tract stroke volume to determine regurgitant volume and fraction (102).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mr Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these factors are not specific for severe MR and should be interpreted in the context of the complete evaluation of the patients. Finally, the use of 3D echocardiography is recommended to overpass some of the pitfalls encountered with 2D examination: the 3D color acquisition of MR allows the direct planimetry of the vena contracta (i.e., regurgitant orifice area) and therefore optimizes the assessment of MR in the context of non-hemispherical PISA shells and multiple jets (Table 1) (19,92,(95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101). Recent method proposes to use 3D color Doppler to measure mitral inflow and LV outflow tract stroke volume to determine regurgitant volume and fraction (102).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mr Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, there is much for us to learn about the timing of intervention in primary MR. The past arguments of which imaging modality is better is not only short-sighted but also irrelevant to current surgical and the rapidly evolving transcatheter technologies for the treatment of MR. 9 The 'What we want' needs to be combined with the 'What we need' to truly provide a clinically useful imaging strategy to take care of the patient with primary MR. From the many modalities and indices we want one thing, that is to be able to integrate all the information to intervene in timely and successful fashion: E Pluribus Unum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%