2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model-Based Predictions of Clinical Endpoints to Optimize Warfarin and Rivaroxaban Anti-Thrombosis Therapy

Abstract: Background Tight monitoring of efficacy and safety of anticoagulants such as warfarin is imperative to optimize the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulants in patients. The standard tests used are measurements of prothrombin time (PT), usually expressed as international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Objective To leverage a previously developed quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model of the human coagulation network to predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FIRM can be expanded to include novel biological findings relevant to sirolimus, such as incorporating novel medications that target antigen-presenting cells (B-cells), T-cell subsets, T-cell signal transduction, costimulatory molecules, or cytokines into QSP models. Early steps are being taken to apply QSP models to precision dosing, specifically in the context of the well-characterized coagulation cascade (Hartmann et al, 2016). However, the inherent complexity of the immune system and the difficulty of measuring many aspects of a patient's immune state in vivo makes it challenging to develop such QSP models of immune response (Laubenbacher et al, 2022).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIRM can be expanded to include novel biological findings relevant to sirolimus, such as incorporating novel medications that target antigen-presenting cells (B-cells), T-cell subsets, T-cell signal transduction, costimulatory molecules, or cytokines into QSP models. Early steps are being taken to apply QSP models to precision dosing, specifically in the context of the well-characterized coagulation cascade (Hartmann et al, 2016). However, the inherent complexity of the immune system and the difficulty of measuring many aspects of a patient's immune state in vivo makes it challenging to develop such QSP models of immune response (Laubenbacher et al, 2022).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QSP models can provide an understanding of the relative contributions of the drug candidate or its metabolites to efficacy and safety at a pathway level, including insight into how receptor variability, signaling heterogeneity, and genetic variability in xenobiotic metabolism and transport can impact outcomes. QSP modeling can provide predictive value in dose selection, the need for alternative dosing, and the probability of demonstrating an outcome under different intrinsic and extrinsic factor conditions that differentiate Asian and Western populations 57–60 . Additionally, advances in the ability to create mathematical models of tumor immunology and the cancer‐immune cycle have resulted in the development of QSP frameworks that can incorporate multidimensional sources of variation 61 .…”
Section: Model‐informed Drug Development Enablersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of these parameters can be either simulated with a priori distributions of anthropometric parameters and a particular model or directly resampled from an existing database. To simulate the inter-patient variation, the pathophysiological parameters can be used as covariations of drug-specific parameters in the estimated models, such as PK/PD, PBPK, and QSP models [ 152 , 153 , 154 ]. With VPs’ estimation, virtual clinical trials can be conducted to predict the clinical response expressed by survival response or frequent response.…”
Section: Model Informed In Vitro To In Vivo Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%