2018
DOI: 10.1101/386912
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative synapse analysis for cell-type specific connectomics

Abstract: Anatomical methods for determining cell-type specific connectivity are essential to inspire and constrain our understanding of neural circuit function. We developed new genetically-encoded reagents for fluorescence-synapse labeling and connectivity analysis in brain tissue, using a fluorogen-activating protein (FAP)-or YFP-coupled, postsynaptically-localized neuroligin-1 targeting sequence (FAP/YFPpost). Sparse viral expression of FAP/YFPpost with the cell-filling, red fluorophore dTomato (dTom) enabled high-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SST and PV cells have relatively distinct projection patterns, the differences are more subtle than the contrast that can be achieved with local GABA iontophoresis, as used in the aforementioned work (Jadi et al, 2012). In fact, in terms of shear anatomical numbers, PV cell inputs outnumber SST cell inputs on dendrites of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons by two-fold (Kuljis et al, 2019). However, the distribution patterns of the dendritic synapses differ for each subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although SST and PV cells have relatively distinct projection patterns, the differences are more subtle than the contrast that can be achieved with local GABA iontophoresis, as used in the aforementioned work (Jadi et al, 2012). In fact, in terms of shear anatomical numbers, PV cell inputs outnumber SST cell inputs on dendrites of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons by two-fold (Kuljis et al, 2019). However, the distribution patterns of the dendritic synapses differ for each subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, reciprocal synaptic connectivity between L2 and L5 pyramidal (Pyr) neurons may also provide an important source of recurrent excitation that can facilitate associative memory and integrate reward and punishment signals that occur with some delay to a sensory stimulus (Lefort et al, 2009). A ubiquitous inhibitory circuit motif found across multiple neocortical areas is composed of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) inhibitory interneurons that synapse strongly onto somatostatin (SST) but weakly onto PV inhibitory neurons (Pfeffer et al, 2013) and generally avoid pyramidal neurons (Jiang et al, 2015;Kuljis et al, 2018). Consequently, the activation of VIP neurons is associated with the suppression of SST neuron activity (Lee et al, 2013), whose elevated spontaneous firing both directly and indirectly inhibits the network (Figure 2A; Urban-Ciecko and ).…”
Section: Plasticity: a Common Feature Of Neocortical Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%