“…This has led surgical teams to use templates and atlases, which do not account for inter-individual anatomic variability, and are oftentimes derived from individuals outside of the patient's population demographics (e.g., age, disease state). Several groups have worked to develop new imaging methods for direct visualization, including susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) (Abosch et al, 2010 ; Najdenovska et al, 2019 ), quantitative magnetic susceptibility mapping (QSM) (Deistung et al, 2013 ; Chiang et al, 2018 ), or white-matter nulled T1 imaging, such as FGATIR (Sudhyadhom et al, 2009 ; Hoch and Shepherd, 2022 ), 3D-EDGE (Middlebrooks et al, 2021 ), and WMn-MPRAGE (Su et al, 2019 ). However, these methods have drawbacks.…”