ABSTRACT:Surface morphologies of thin films of polypyrrole doped with two similar anions (with different ionic radii) viz. chloride and bromide were compared by means of fractal geometry. Scanning electron micrographs of the polymer surfaces showed a significant difference between the surface structures of two anion-doped polypyrrole films in microscale and particularly in nanoscale. Surprisingly, the bromide-doped polypyrrole had nanostructure; whereas, the chloride-doped polypyrrole surface was smooth in nanoscale. An electrochemical method based on gold-masking approach was employed to reveal the fractality of these polymer surfaces in microscale. Fractal geometry successfully discovered the effect of anion doping on microstructure of the conductive polymer by suggesting different fractal dimensions. In addition, SAXS analysis indicated significant difference in fractality of the polymer in nanoscale.[doi:10.1295/polymj.PJ2005173] KEY WORDS Surface Morphology / Nanoscale Roughness / Fractal / Conductive Polymer / Nanostructures / Electrode Surface / It is well known that anion doping has a significant influence on surface morphology of conductive polymers. As anion doping is an essential process in the course of polymer synthesis, this issue is of great interest. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] There are two affecting factors in anion doping: size of the anion incorporated into the polymer structure and the synthesis mechanism in the presence of the anion. To inspect the second factor, it is only needed to choose two different anions with approximately the same ionic radii. However, it is difficult to investigate the first factor since anion effects on the polymerization are essentially different. Investigations in this context are mainly restricted to common anions such as Cl À , NO 3 À , ClO 4 À , SO 4 2À , etc.1-12 As Compton and coworkers emphasized the inner oxygen bond in the anion has a significant effect on the polymerization process.8 Thus, comparison of monoatomic anions such as Cl À with other anions is not correct. To overcome this problem, we aim to compare two similar monoatomic anions as dopants, since this strategy is not usually followed in the literature.Fractal geometry as a powerful tool was employed for surface analysis of a typical conductive polymer. Applicability of fractal analysis for surface studies of conductive polymers has been widely reported in the literature. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Although, it has been emphasized that usefulness of fractal analysis is related to comparative studies of similar surfaces, less attention has been paid to this issue for the investigation of surface morphology of different anion-doped conductive polymers. Gobal et al. have investigated the fractal structure of anion-doped poly-ortho-aminophenol films by means of electrochemical methods, and concluded that anion doping has no effect on fractal structure of conductive polymers. 22 This incorrect conclusion (as it is well known that surface morphology of a conductive polymer is h...