Quantitative study of the behavior of two broadcast spawners, the sea urchinsStrongylocentrotus intermediusandMesocentrotus nudus, during mass spawning events in situ

Abstract

Background The spatial distribution of spawners and temporal parameters of spawning in motile invertebrates with external fertilization might influence reproductive success. However, to date, data on the prespawning and spawning behaviors of broadcast spawners in the field have been scarce and mostly qualitative. The present study was intended to clarify the behavioral adaptations of two sea urchin species, Strongylocentrotus intermedius and Mesocentrotus nudus, using quantitative analysis of their behavior during mass spawning events under natural conditions. Methods We analyzed in situ video recordings of sea urchin behavior obtained during six spawning seasons (2014–2019). The total number of specimens of each sea urchin species and the numbers of spawning males and females were counted. Quantitative parameters of sea urchin spawning (numbers of gamete batches, release duration of one gamete batch, time intervals between gamete batches and total duration of spawning) and movement (step length of spawners and nonspawners before and during spawning and changes in distances between males/nonspawners and females) were determined. Results For each species, 12 mass spawning events were recorded in which 10 or more individuals participated. The temporal dynamics of the numbers of males and females participating in mass spawning were well synchronized in both species; however, males began to spawn earlier and ended their spawning later than females. In both species, the most significant intersex difference was the longer spawning duration in males due to the longer pause between gamete batches. The total duration of gamete release did not differ significantly between sexes. The average duration of sperm release during mass spawning events was longer than solitary male spawning. Males and females showed significant increases in the locomotion rate 35 min before the start of spawning and continued to actively move during spawning. An increase in movement rate before spawning in males and females was induced by environmental factor(s). Nonspawners of both species showed increased locomotion activity but in the presence of spawning neighbors and less prominently than spawners. On a vertical surface, both echinoids moved strictly upward. On flat surfaces, males, females and nonspawners of both echinoids became closer during spawning. Discussion We showed that two sea urchin species with planktotrophic larvae display similar behavioral adaptations aimed at enhancing reproductive success. The high sensitivity of sea urchins, primarily males, to some environmental factors, most likely phytoplankton, may be considered a large-scale adaptation promoting the development of mass spawning events. The longer spawning duration in males and increased movement activity before and during spawning in both sexes may be considered small-scale adaptations promoting approach of males and females and enhancing the chances of egg fertilization.

Investigating the timing of spawning of two sea urchins (Tripneustes gratilla and Toxopneustes pileolus)

“…Strongylocentrotus intermedius and Mesocentrotus nudus showed significant increases in their locomotion rate before and during spawning and the authors concluded that this synchronization was likely caused by the concentrations of phytoplankton (Zhadan et al, 2021). Nevertheless, the frequency of spawning in nature for each individual and whether it is synchronized among individuals remain unclear.…”

“…The sea urchin Arbacia punctulata in the Gulf of Mexico was also reported to have a lunar reproductive rhythm around the new moon during the summer months from May to July (Hernandez et al., 2022). Strongylocentrotus intermedius and Mesocentrotus nudus showed significant increases in their locomotion rate before and during spawning and the authors concluded that this synchronization was likely caused by the concentrations of phytoplankton (Zhadan et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the frequency of spawning in nature for each individual and whether it is synchronized among individuals remain unclear.…”